“…As a result, the zeta-potential decrease in both the colloidal silica abrasives and the polished Si wafer surface due to coating EDA on them reduced significantly the repulsive force between the colloidal silica abrasives and the polished Si wafer surface via Coulombic interaction between abrasives and film surface (i.e., , where , , , and are the repulsive force between the colloidal silica abrasives and the polished Si wafer surface, the zeta-potential of the colloidal silica abrasives, the zeta-potential of the polished Si wafer, and distance between the colloidal silica abrasives and the polished Si wafer surface, respectively), as shown in Figure 4 c [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. To understand how the relative electrostatic repulsive force influences the Si wafer polishing rate, the correlation was determined between the Si wafer polishing rate and relative electrostatic repulsive force for NaOH, KOH, and EDA, as shown in Figure 4 d. For all of the hydrolysis reaction accelerators, the Si wafer polishing rate decreased notably, from 552.8 to 139.5 nm/min, when the relative electrostatic repulsive force was increased from 1043 to 1503 abs., i.e., higher relative electrostatic repulsive force led to lower Si wafer polishing rate [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. In particular, the relative electrostatic repulsive force (i.e., 1503 abs.)…”