1998
DOI: 10.1109/15.659522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface transfer impedance measurement: a comparison between current probe and pull-on braid methods for coaxial cables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 and 7, respectively) given by Tyni (1976) and Demoulin et al (1981). It has been found in previous investigations (Mushtaq et. al., 2013) that comparatively Demoulin model (Demoulin et al, 1981;Kone, 2010, 2011), as per Eqs.…”
Section: Transfer Impedance Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6 and 7, respectively) given by Tyni (1976) and Demoulin et al (1981). It has been found in previous investigations (Mushtaq et. al., 2013) that comparatively Demoulin model (Demoulin et al, 1981;Kone, 2010, 2011), as per Eqs.…”
Section: Transfer Impedance Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This method can be used to measure Z T for braided shield cables and semi-rigid cables but application to large and nonsymmetrical automotive cable connector systems is difficult as Green's functions for each DUT needs to be defined in order to measure Z T . To measure Z T without the GTEM cell or Triaxial Tube for both HV cable and HV cable connector systems the Ground Plate Method, (GPM) was proposed (Mushtaq et al, 2013). For validation, improved GPM has been compared with Triaxial Method and Line Injection Method.…”
Section: Transfer Impedance Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…inner conductor, cable shield and outer tube) is widely used to measure the complex transfer impedance and admittance of shielded cable [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%