2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.174423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure of CO on Co∕Pd(111) magnetic thin films and its effect on the spin reorientation transition of the film

Abstract: The CO surface structures on Co/ Pd͑111͒ magnetic thin film and the chemisorption-driven spin reorientation transition have been studied by soft x-ray spectroscopies. C 1s photoelectron diffraction for CO/ Co/ Pd͑111͒ revealed that CO is adsorbed both on the atop and bridge sites at 200 K, while CO is adsorbed exclusively on the atop site at 300 K. From simultaneous measurement of C 1s photoelectron spectroscopy and Co L-edge x-ray magnetic circular dichroism during stepwise CO adsorption and annealing, it was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the fcc Co(1 1 1) surface are almost the same; an exception is somewhat higher m's for three-fold adsorption sites on Co(1 1 1) than on Co(0 0 0 1). The calculated C-O bond length for CO in the atop position agrees with the LEED result for the Co(0 0 0 1) surface [18], whereas we get slightly shorter Co-C separation than the value 1.78 ± 0.06 Å derived for adsorption above the (0 0 0 1) [18] and (1 1 1) [24] surface, respectively. According to the experiment [20], K co-adsorption moves CO to three-fold fcc and hcp sites above Co(0 0 0 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results for the fcc Co(1 1 1) surface are almost the same; an exception is somewhat higher m's for three-fold adsorption sites on Co(1 1 1) than on Co(0 0 0 1). The calculated C-O bond length for CO in the atop position agrees with the LEED result for the Co(0 0 0 1) surface [18], whereas we get slightly shorter Co-C separation than the value 1.78 ± 0.06 Å derived for adsorption above the (0 0 0 1) [18] and (1 1 1) [24] surface, respectively. According to the experiment [20], K co-adsorption moves CO to three-fold fcc and hcp sites above Co(0 0 0 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It would be interesting to know whether the latter result has some relation to the large Co-C distance for the CO in bridge position above Co(1 1 1) claimed for the lowtemperature chemisorption phase in the Ref. [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In-plane to out-of-plane and out-of-plane to in-plane SRTs were observed for hcp Co/Ru(0001), occurring at thicknesses of 2 and 3 atomic layers (ALs), respectively . Further, we note that the MA of ultrathin Co films is known to be strongly influenced by the adsorption of CO and other gases, as has been repeatedly reported. The choice of a heavy metal substrate, Re, was functional to obtaining strong and asymmetric exchange interactions at the interface, also known as the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI). , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…It has appeared that the results resemble those for chemisorption on the Co(0 0 0 1) surface -a conclusion that is quite natural because of the close similarity of the two surfaces. CO chemisorption on Co(1 1 1) films deposited on Pd(1 1 1) is of considerable interest [5] because of changing the film magnetization direction. The likeness does not extend to the film magnetic anisotropy because of the considerable anisotropy of the bulk region [6] in hcp films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%