1993
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5729(93)90025-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure determination with X-ray standing waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
231
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
4
231
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This causes f c as well as p c to be more sensitive to vertical displacements of the atoms with respect to the extended lattice planes. 22,34,49 Hence, thermal vibrations lead to a stronger reduction of the f c values. In addition, a small fraction of molecules at defect sites (which are more likely on this most open surface), which are in a structurally different adsorption geometry and lead to an incoherent contribution in the NIXSW curves, could play a role here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes f c as well as p c to be more sensitive to vertical displacements of the atoms with respect to the extended lattice planes. 22,34,49 Hence, thermal vibrations lead to a stronger reduction of the f c values. In addition, a small fraction of molecules at defect sites (which are more likely on this most open surface), which are in a structurally different adsorption geometry and lead to an incoherent contribution in the NIXSW curves, could play a role here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most precise way to determine that distance experimentally is by means of normal incidence X-ray Standing Waves (XSW). 3,4 This technique has been applied to a number of molecules on various surfaces. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Here we report the use of XSW to determine the molecule-substrate distances in donor-acceptor molecular blends, which are not only highly relevant for many organic devices, but also have interfacial properties often differing from those of the corresponding single component layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of the FeK α fluorescence yield curve is quite similar to that of the reflectivity curve. One of the possible explanations of this experimental fact is that the implanted atoms are randomly distributed [4,7]. Figure 2 shows the FeKα fluorescence yield curve for the sample after annealing at 750°C.…”
Section: Xsw Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reviews [4,7]). However, the interpretation of XSW results is in some cases quite a complicated and even not uniquely solvable problem [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%