1969
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.3404.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Structure, Deep Structure, and Transformations: A Model for Syntactic Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hass and Hass (1972) contrast their "three faces of syntax:" surface structure, semantic representation and transformation with Osgood's model and reject the acquisition of meaning and transformational features as the result of association. Hass and associates Hass, 1972, Hass andWepman, 1969) further compare their "inherent equence in terms or organisation" to the Piagetian cognitive-developmental model. Surface structure is hierarchical and likened to the sensori-motor stage of development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hass and Hass (1972) contrast their "three faces of syntax:" surface structure, semantic representation and transformation with Osgood's model and reject the acquisition of meaning and transformational features as the result of association. Hass and associates Hass, 1972, Hass andWepman, 1969) further compare their "inherent equence in terms or organisation" to the Piagetian cognitive-developmental model. Surface structure is hierarchical and likened to the sensori-motor stage of development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%