2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure, activity and microgravimetry modeling delineate contrasted mud chamber types below flat and conical mud volcanoes from Azerbaijan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The southern margin of the East European craton keeps relatively stable. Similar regimes set almost in the whole territory of the Scythian plate, except for its Caspian side [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], where the zone of varied regimes with the dominant extension and downwarping forms, and the southern margin, with inceptive submontane troughs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The southern margin of the East European craton keeps relatively stable. Similar regimes set almost in the whole territory of the Scythian plate, except for its Caspian side [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], where the zone of varied regimes with the dominant extension and downwarping forms, and the southern margin, with inceptive submontane troughs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum velocities were observed in the Indol-Kuban basin in the Maykopian period, in the Terek-Caspian basin in the Miocene and in the Indol-Kuban basin again in the Pliocene. Both basins are conventionally assumed to be the frontal foredeeps ahead of the Caucasus orogeny front, which is considered as a key control factor the genesis and evolution of the basins [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The accomplished analysis shows that a potential complimentary factor to control tectonic downwarping of the Indol-Kuban basin at some stages of its development is the indirect influence of rifting in the Eastern Black Sea depression, via a system of shearinduced dislocations.…”
Section: Erc Rc Er H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Cr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As follows from the map, the areas of the sedimentation cross-section with the total thickness of more than 1.5 km occupy the largest part of the Black Sea-Caspian region. Sediments are absent or have the thickness smaller than 1.5 km in the areas of the Anatolian-Iran boundary of the Black Sea-Caspian region, at its Balkan and East Mysian (Dobrudzha) limits, in the areas of the Ukrainian shield, Folded Donbass and some parts of the Karpinsk ridge, which limit the region in the north, and at some inner and marginal uplifts in the region [35][36][37]. The latter are the orogenesis-Caucasus, Crimean and Mangyshlak, and some domelike and swell-like uplifts-the Arkhangelsk uplift in the Black Sea, Azov swell and Central Crimean and Karabogaz swells, as well as the smaller size structures.…”
Section: Han Han Ha H H Han Ha An Han Han Han An Han H Han Ha H Han A...mentioning
confidence: 99%