2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.085405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface stress effects on the resonance properties of cantilever sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In this effect, the surface stress is simplified to an external axial force that creates a shearing moment. Recently, Lu et al 7 have demonstrated that this model is inadequate to describe the physical system because in the real situation, the cantilever free end allows the deformation to relieve the stress. In their theoretical treatment, a strain-dependent surface stress is necessary to observe some effect on the resonant frequency, and therefore the surface stress effect is expected to be negligible in biomolecular applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In this effect, the surface stress is simplified to an external axial force that creates a shearing moment. Recently, Lu et al 7 have demonstrated that this model is inadequate to describe the physical system because in the real situation, the cantilever free end allows the deformation to relieve the stress. In their theoretical treatment, a strain-dependent surface stress is necessary to observe some effect on the resonant frequency, and therefore the surface stress effect is expected to be negligible in biomolecular applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total surface stress ͑⌺͒ can be written as a sum of a strain-independent part ͑ ͒ and a strain-dependent part ͑strain ⑀͒, which is related to surface elasticity ͑C s ͒ ⌺ = + C s ⑀. [11][12][13][14][15] In this letter, we study the size-dependency of the Young's modulus in silicon nitride cantilevers when one dimension ͑cantilever thickness͒ is scaled down from 684 to 20 nm. As the SiN x is amorphous, it is difficult to distinguish between the two contributions since parameters ͑e.g., C s ͒ are unknown and difficult to calculate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,13 Using Eqs. ͑1͒-͑7͒, tangential stress resultants and tangential stress couples, which are energetically conjugate to ␥ and ͓see Eq.…”
Section: ͑6͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their small size and thus the large surface-to-volume ratio, the surface stress effects have been suggested as the explanation for the size effects. 8 As a consequence, the majority of research concerning the elastic response of nanostructures have focused on surface stress [9][10][11] and surface elasticity 5,12,13 effects. Miller and Shenoy 5 developed a simple model to incorporate surface elasticity in an effective elastic modulus for plates and rods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%