1983
DOI: 10.1063/1.445880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface spinodals and extended wetting in fluids and polymer solutions

Abstract: A novel concept of ‘‘surface’’ spinodal decomposition is introduced in the context of wetting and prewetting first order transitions for simple fluids in contact with a bounding wall. Qualitative and semiquantitative discussions are made within the framework of a phenomenological Landau theoretical model for semi-infinite systems with a (short-ranged) wall potential. A concept of ‘‘extended wetting’’ is also proposed, whereby even for T<TW (the wetting temperature) a macroscopically thick ‘‘wetting’’ la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that, at two-phase coexistence, the wall is always wetted with the preferred phase, but that there is strong enhancement of the preferred component at the wall even away from two phase coexistence. In disagreement with previous work by Nakanishi and Pincus [31], Schmidt and Binder argued that it should be possible to observe second-order wetting in a binary polymer mixture (in which mean-field descriptions should work well, and the spinodal should be well defined rather than smeared out by fluctuations, as it would be in simple fluid systems). The disagreement arises from a difference in the magnitude of the polymer wall interactions assumed by the authors, with the assumptions of Schmidt and Binder probably being much more physical, since the latter work assumes that the interactions between polymer segments and surfaces is of comparable magnitude to that between simple molecules and surfaces, as explained in section 2.3.3.…”
Section: Wetting In Polymer Systemscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They found that, at two-phase coexistence, the wall is always wetted with the preferred phase, but that there is strong enhancement of the preferred component at the wall even away from two phase coexistence. In disagreement with previous work by Nakanishi and Pincus [31], Schmidt and Binder argued that it should be possible to observe second-order wetting in a binary polymer mixture (in which mean-field descriptions should work well, and the spinodal should be well defined rather than smeared out by fluctuations, as it would be in simple fluid systems). The disagreement arises from a difference in the magnitude of the polymer wall interactions assumed by the authors, with the assumptions of Schmidt and Binder probably being much more physical, since the latter work assumes that the interactions between polymer segments and surfaces is of comparable magnitude to that between simple molecules and surfaces, as explained in section 2.3.3.…”
Section: Wetting In Polymer Systemscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Perhaps they were first to write the surface energy in a phenomenological form like in equation (2.3). Using the same description of a simple bulk fluid in contact with a surface, Nakanishi and Pincus later studied 'surface spinodal decomposition' (where the surface gives directionality to spinodal decomposition) for fluids near a wall [31], describing the model as "the simplest model for wetting where an incremental chemical potential δ∆µ = h 1 k B T is introduced favouring one component, say B, of a binary fluid mixture near the wall" with an enhancement term describing an "enhancement near the wall in the effective molecular couplings".…”
Section: Simple Fluid Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations