1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.22.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Spin Waves in Antiferromagnetic NiO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability and utility of LEED to investigate the surface AFM order were first demonstrated by Palmberg et al [33] for the case of NiO(001) single-crystal surface, more than 50 years ago. There have been a few further studies following this [34][35][36][37], where this method has been used for the estimation of the surface Néel temperatures. However, despite its suitability for the investigation of the surface AFM order, this method has not been popular, possibly owing to technical difficulties and inherent limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability and utility of LEED to investigate the surface AFM order were first demonstrated by Palmberg et al [33] for the case of NiO(001) single-crystal surface, more than 50 years ago. There have been a few further studies following this [34][35][36][37], where this method has been used for the estimation of the surface Néel temperatures. However, despite its suitability for the investigation of the surface AFM order, this method has not been popular, possibly owing to technical difficulties and inherent limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At such a low frequency, one could expect a nearly adiabatic response, with very little mechanical energy transferred from the tip to some low-frequency excitations such as magnons, or perhaps phonons. Antiferromagnetic magnons, the first obvious choice, are immediately ruled out since, owing to strong dipolar anisotropy, the antiferromagnetic spin-wave dispersion of NiO has a bulk gap ∆ ∼ 1.5 meV ∼ 0.36 THz [4], and one at least as large at the surface [5][6][7]. As a result, the oscillatory perturbation exerted on the surface spin is completely adiabatic -ω tip ≪ ∆ by more than 6 orders of magnitude -and direct dissipation in the spin-wave channel vanishes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%