2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-015-9159-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Smoothing Procedures in Computational Contact Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a contact surface between two bodies is subjected to a spatially constant stress field, this stress field should be exactly transmitted from one body to another [24], as any variations in the stress at the interface are due to errors in the formulation employed. In this study, we perform the patch test proposed by Neto et al [37]. Two cubes of identical geometry and material properties are pressed against each other under frictionless conditions ( Fig.…”
Section: Patch Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a contact surface between two bodies is subjected to a spatially constant stress field, this stress field should be exactly transmitted from one body to another [24], as any variations in the stress at the interface are due to errors in the formulation employed. In this study, we perform the patch test proposed by Neto et al [37]. Two cubes of identical geometry and material properties are pressed against each other under frictionless conditions ( Fig.…”
Section: Patch Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmentto-segment algorithms [25,26], introduced to enforce constraints in an approximate sense in an effort to remedy errors associated with NTS algorithms, led to development of the mortar method [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. An alternative approach has been the development of contact smoothing algorithms [36,37], which attempt to provide tangent plane continuity between adjacent segments, thus mitigating the errors associated with discretization at the cost of computational efficiency. More recently, the concept of isogeometric contact was proposed by Hughes et al [38], which adopts the shape functions of 3D modeling software for contact analyses to obtain a smoother description of the contact interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All numerical simulations were performed with the in-house finite element code DD3IMP [5], assuming that the forming tools are rigid and described with Nagata patches [6]. The Coulomb friction law is adopted considering a constant value for the friction coefficient of 0.15, as recommended by the benchmark committee.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element simulations were performed with the in-house finite element code DD3IMP [6], assuming that the forming tools are rigid [7]. The study is focused on the influence of the friction conditions at the interface between the blank and the punch.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%