1995
DOI: 10.1039/ft9959101763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface second-harmonic generation at air/solvent and solvent/solvent interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, an explanation is warranted as to why there is a drop, rather than an increase, in the signal upon adsorption of water (or ice) on the surface (of either mica or sapphire). The SHG response reflects the overall arrangements of the polar entities at the interface between two isotropic media (Fordyce et al, 2001;Goh et al, 1988;Luca et al, 1995). This signal intensity is expected to increase when a single (or a few non-centrosymmetric) layer(s) of water or ice is (are) formed at (or added to) the surface, while SHG intensity decreases upon deposition freezing, condensation, and the growth of liquid layers by diffusion as can be seen in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, an explanation is warranted as to why there is a drop, rather than an increase, in the signal upon adsorption of water (or ice) on the surface (of either mica or sapphire). The SHG response reflects the overall arrangements of the polar entities at the interface between two isotropic media (Fordyce et al, 2001;Goh et al, 1988;Luca et al, 1995). This signal intensity is expected to increase when a single (or a few non-centrosymmetric) layer(s) of water or ice is (are) formed at (or added to) the surface, while SHG intensity decreases upon deposition freezing, condensation, and the growth of liquid layers by diffusion as can be seen in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the system described here, the SHG signal originates in the nonresonant electric dipolar contribution of the interfacial molecules. The signal response relates to the overall arrangements of the interfacial entities (Fordyce et al, 2001;Goh et al, 1988;Luca et al, 1995) and is proportional to the incident field and the second-order nonlinear susceptibility χ (2) of the interface. When the interface is charged, due to this charge, the static electric field can induce a third-order nonlinear polarization due to the contribution of the thirdorder nonlinear susceptibility χ (3) of the solution (Ong et al, 1992;Zhao et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 In the early days of the development of SHG for interface studies, it has been fully realized that, in applying SHG to real problems, it is important to know how to assess the relative magnitudes of the interface (local) contribution and the still possibly significant bulk electric-quadrupole and magnetic-dipole (nonlocal) contributions to the SHG signal. 5,13,14,15 Even though there were exchanges of debates on whether SHG can be an effective probe for isotropic liquid interfaces, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study of surface phenomena at various interfaces, the total internal reflection (TIR) condition has been used in a number of spectroscopic measurements, 1 such as fluorometry, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] surface enhanced infrared spectroscopy (SEIRA), [10][11][12] second harmonic generation, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and sum frequency generation (SFG). [22][23][24][25] There are two advantages when one uses the TIR condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%