2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness effects on the tribo-charging and mixing homogeneity of adhesive mixtures used in dry powder inhalers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wall layer development in a tribocharged fluidized bed 861 as impurities and oxides, surface roughness, object geometry and relative humidity, which pose challenges in numerical modelling (Castle 1997;Karner et al 2014;Schella, Herminghaus & Schroter 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall layer development in a tribocharged fluidized bed 861 as impurities and oxides, surface roughness, object geometry and relative humidity, which pose challenges in numerical modelling (Castle 1997;Karner et al 2014;Schella, Herminghaus & Schroter 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical primary aerodynamic diameter of the particles (D ae ) is estimated from the average particle size (D 50 ) and tapped density data ( tap ) using [31,32]: (3) where 1 = 1 g/cm 3 …”
Section: Particle Size Powder Density Carr Index Hausner Ratio Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preparation of inhalable medications, small particles of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are mixed with large carrier particles [3]. In order to aerosolize the drug particles, the properties of both the carriers and the API particles are of great importance since the drug-carrier adhesive forces need to be overcome by the patient's inspiratory force [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) to evaluate both the cohesive and adhesive interactions between materials used in drug delivery (Adi et al, 2007;Beilmann et al, 2007;De Boer et al, 2003a,b;Eve et al, 2002;James et al, 2008;Karner et al, 2014;Louey et al, 2001;Price et al, 2002;Sindel and Zimmermann, 2001;Tsukada et al, 2004;Young et al, 2009) and, quite recently, the mechanism of particle detachment (Cui and Sommerfeld, 2015). While three different scenarios describing the process of particle detachment-lift-off, sliding and rolling-are possible, a combination of colloidal probe measurements, simulations and computational modelling identified the rolling mechanism, closely followed by sliding, as the main mechanisms of particle detachment.…”
Section: Adhesion Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%