2000
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/12/13/302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness and surface-induced resistivity of gold films on mica: influence of roughness modelling

Abstract: We report measurements of the temperature dependent resistivity ρ(T ) of a gold film 70 nm thick deposited on mica preheated to 300 • C in UHV, performed between 4 K and 300 K, and measurements of the surface topography of the same film performed with a scanning tunnelling microscope (STM). From the roughness measured with the STM we determine the parameters δ (r.m.s. amplitude) and ξ (lateral correlation length) corresponding to a Gaussian and to an exponential representation of the average autocorrelation fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, we are aware of only one group which accompanies the measurements of the interplay between electron-phonon and roughness scattering channels as a function of temperature by the simultaneous analysis of surface roughness. 14,26 It is instructive to compare our semianalytical quasiclassical results with previous quantum computations which explicitly include QSE. 4,5,8,10 Reference 4 does not contain any explicit equations for the interference terms that can be compared with our results, especially in the quasiclassical regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Currently, we are aware of only one group which accompanies the measurements of the interplay between electron-phonon and roughness scattering channels as a function of temperature by the simultaneous analysis of surface roughness. 14,26 It is instructive to compare our semianalytical quasiclassical results with previous quantum computations which explicitly include QSE. 4,5,8,10 Reference 4 does not contain any explicit equations for the interference terms that can be compared with our results, especially in the quasiclassical regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The correlation function ψ (y) not only affects directly, via the integral (34), but it also can distort the experimental measurements of the amplitude and the correlation radius of surface inhomogeneities η and r. The result of the STM study of a rough metal surface in Ref. [16] showed that the values of η and r were vastly different depending on whether the same STM data were fitted using the Gaussian or simple exponential correlation function. This result is even more surprising taking into account the fact that both of these correlation functions, in contrast to the power-law correlators, have well-defined values of the correlation radius and the roughness amplitude.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many other realistic forms of the correlation function that differ from each other by the rate of decay of the correlator in real or Fourier space [14][15][16]. Below, in addition to the Gaussian correlator, we will investigate two major classes of the correlation functions following Ref.…”
Section: Quantum Diffusion Of Neutrons In a Rough Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many papers have proved that the electrical and optical properties of thin films depend explicitly on the film thickness, the RMS roughness w, the lateral correlation length ξ(t), and the roughness exponent α [10][11][12][13]. However, little work has been done in the studies of the morphological roughness evolutions in the GZO film growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%