2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated good estimation for the whole cropping season [48]. Drexler et al performed experiments for the evaluation of the SR method over rangeland grass using the SR and EC methods.…”
Section: Sr Versus Eddymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated good estimation for the whole cropping season [48]. Drexler et al performed experiments for the evaluation of the SR method over rangeland grass using the SR and EC methods.…”
Section: Sr Versus Eddymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting factor α generally depends on the measurement height, lag time, canopy structure and thermocouple size (Snyder et al, 1996;Spano et al, 1997aSpano et al, ,b, 2000Duce et al, 1998). Once determined, α is fairly stable, almost invariant and does not change from site to site regardless of weather conditions unless the canopy structure changes (Paw U et al, 1995;Snyder et al, 1996Snyder et al, , 2008Spano et al, 2000). A consistent α value of 0.5, using air temperature measurements conducted at canopy height, for coniferous forests, orchards, and maize canopies (Paw U et al, 1995); and 1.0 for short turf grass using measurements conducted at several heights above the canopy (Snyder et al, 1996) were reported to give best estimates of H compared to EC.…”
Section: Surface Renewal (Sr) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SR method has been successfully applied over a range of surfaces (e.g., Paw U et al, 1995;Snyder et al, 1996Snyder et al, , 2008Duce et al, 1997;Spano et al, 1997aSpano et al, ,b, 2000Zapta and Martínez-Cob, 2001;Savage et al, 2004;Mengistu, 2008;Abraha, 2010;Nile, 2010) including open water (Mengistu and Savage, 2010). The method has been in constant development and refinement since its introduction, and several versions of the SR method for estimation of H exist.…”
Section: Surface Renewal (Sr) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This required a rapid computational method that worked over a range of different time averaging periods, and which could implement the various calibration procedures used in the SR method. Initial attempts to calculate flux followed methods as described by Paw U et al (2005) and Snyder et al (2008). However, implementing these methods as documented was hampered by slow computation time, which constrained the many iterations required to determine the minimum flux averaging period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%