2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4859-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-protein interactions on different stainless steel grades: effects of protein adsorption, surface changes and metal release

Abstract: Implantation using stainless steels (SS) is an example where an understanding of protein-induced metal release from SS is important when assessing potential toxicological risks. Here, the protein-induced metal release was investigated for austenitic (AISI 304, 310, and 316L), ferritic (AISI 430), and duplex (AISI 2205) grades in a phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) solution containing either bovine serum albumin (BSA) or lysozyme (LSZ). The results show that both BSA and LSZ induce a significant enrichmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
141
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
11
141
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, Fe was predominantly released from both grades followed by the release of Ni, Cr, and Mn. This is in agreement with previous investigations of metal release from these grades in citric acid and other aqueous acidic or neutral solutions [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . The release pattern is related to the passive mixed surface oxide of Cr 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 with metallic nickel present in the alloy surface layer beneath the surface oxide 11,20) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, Fe was predominantly released from both grades followed by the release of Ni, Cr, and Mn. This is in agreement with previous investigations of metal release from these grades in citric acid and other aqueous acidic or neutral solutions [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . The release pattern is related to the passive mixed surface oxide of Cr 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 with metallic nickel present in the alloy surface layer beneath the surface oxide 11,20) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1 it is evident that the extent of released metals in citric acid decreased significantly for both grades at alkaline pH (pH 11) compared with neutral and acidic pH conditions (pH 3.1, 4.8, and 6.4). A lower metal release in alkaline solutions compared with acidic solutions is generally expected for stainless steels 19,22,23) . Citric acid has been shown to induce ligand/complexation-induced metal release for stainless steels (no corrosion of the alloy substrate, but chemical or electrochemical dissolution of the surface oxide) 19,22,23) (Mazinanian, Odnevall Wallinder, Hedberg, unpublished data).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, previous studies on metal release comparing the influence of two different proteins (at pH 7.4), bovine serum albumin and lysozyme from chicken egg white, showed that the protein that formed a thicker layer (lysozyme) was not inducing any increased Ni release. 30 This suggests that, once Ni is available for surface complexation, e.g. due to surface defects, it would be complexed and possibly released.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Protein adsorption will be inuenced by the surface chemistry of the metals (e.g., type of oxides/hydroxides formed on the surface and the resulting surface wettability and surface charges). It is generally acknowledged that protein adsorption is stronger on hydrophobic than hydrophilic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%