2011
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2011.557340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Pressure and Shear Stress Fields within a Frictional Contact on Rubber

Abstract: This paper addresses the issue of the determination of the frictional stress distribution from the inversion of the measured surface displacement field for sliding interfaces between a glass lens and a rubber (poly(dimethylsiloxane)) substrate. Experimental results show that high lateral strains are achieved at the periphery of the sliding contacts. As a consequence, an accurate inversion of the displacement field requires that finite strains and non linear response of the rubber substrate are taken into accou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deladi et al [14] modeled the static friction for contact between rough rubber and metal surfaces. As described in several works by Barquins et al [15,16], Savkoor [17,18] or more recently by Scheibert et al [19] or Audry and co-workers [20], the static friction of rubber contacts involves complex peeling and micro-slip phenomena which deserve a fracture mechanics description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deladi et al [14] modeled the static friction for contact between rough rubber and metal surfaces. As described in several works by Barquins et al [15,16], Savkoor [17,18] or more recently by Scheibert et al [19] or Audry and co-workers [20], the static friction of rubber contacts involves complex peeling and micro-slip phenomena which deserve a fracture mechanics description.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As described in several works by Barquins et al [15,16], Savkoor [17,18] or more recently by Scheibert et al [19] or Audry and co-workers [20], the static friction of rubber contacts involves complex peeling and micro-slip phenomena which deserve a fracture mechanics description. Moreover, rubber-like materials sliding against rigid metals under wet conditions is a common process for many engineering applications [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Once imaged in transmission with a white light, the pattern appears as a network of dark spots which are easily detected. Full details regarding the design and fabrication of PDMS substrates are provided in [1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, one can cite the local friction of smooth rubbers surfaces with statistically rough rigid bodies. At the scale of the macroscopic contact, the finite sizes of the contacting bodies induce in-plane surface strains which can easily exceed 0.2 can under the action of a frictional stress [1,2]. At the microscopic scale, this implies that single micro-asperity contacts occur locally on a pre-stretched rubber surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deladi et al [17] proposed a static contact model to predict friction between rough rubber and metal surfaces. Furthermore, the fracture mechanics that were developed by Maugis et al [18], Savkoor [19] and more recently to Scheibert et al [20] or Audry and co-workers [21] have been used to discuss the separation of interfaces in the rubber-static frictional contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%