2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface potentials of magnetron sputtered transparent conducting oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
124
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
20
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In both studies, however, the formation energies are severely underestimated leading to pinning values of the Fermi energy well below those experimentally accessible. 17 This would imply, that in contrast to experimental findings, n-type doping is hardly possible especially under more oxygen-rich conditions and that the Fermi level cannot enter into conduction band significantly. If one considers the large formation entropies of acceptor-type defects 18 the situation becomes even worse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…6 In both studies, however, the formation energies are severely underestimated leading to pinning values of the Fermi energy well below those experimentally accessible. 17 This would imply, that in contrast to experimental findings, n-type doping is hardly possible especially under more oxygen-rich conditions and that the Fermi level cannot enter into conduction band significantly. If one considers the large formation entropies of acceptor-type defects 18 the situation becomes even worse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Systematic photoemission studies of in situ magnetron sputter deposited ITO films have been carried out by Klein and coworkers, [65][66][67] who also investigated the ITO/ZnPc interface. 66 function.…”
Section: Photoemission Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron affinity seems to vary in the range of A = 4.1...5.0 eV in dependence on the doping concentration (see Ref. 33 and references therein). Together with the measured gap of 3.6 eV, ionization energies of I = 7.7...8.6 eV may be derived.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%