1984
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1984.0320207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Potentials Derived from Co-Ion Exclusion Measurements on Homoionic Montmorillonite and Illite

Abstract: Abstract-Simple equations are presented which allow double-layer potentials of clays to be derived from co-ion exclusion measurements in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. These equations have been used to re-interpret earlier results for illite and montmorillonite. The potentials derived follow the lyotropic series for the various homoionic modification of each clay. We have demonstrated that the Schofield equation, which assumes high double-layer potentials, cannot be applied to co-ion exclusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller value corresponds to low surface potentials (--<50 mV) and the large value to surface potentials >-150 inV. As the surface potentials calculated from the surface charge density are distinctly higher, the observed CK ratio confirms the strong Stern-layer adsorption of the inorganic counterions (Chan et al, 1984;Goldberg, 1992; Gan and Low, 1993;Lagaly, 1994a, 1994b;Quirk and Mar~elja, 1997). The monovalent organic cations are adsorbed more strongly than the inorganic ions.…”
Section: Critical Coagulation Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The smaller value corresponds to low surface potentials (--<50 mV) and the large value to surface potentials >-150 inV. As the surface potentials calculated from the surface charge density are distinctly higher, the observed CK ratio confirms the strong Stern-layer adsorption of the inorganic counterions (Chan et al, 1984;Goldberg, 1992; Gan and Low, 1993;Lagaly, 1994a, 1994b;Quirk and Mar~elja, 1997). The monovalent organic cations are adsorbed more strongly than the inorganic ions.…”
Section: Critical Coagulation Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Accordingly, it has been assumed that the surface charge density is constant and equals the quotient of the cation-exchange capacity and surface area. From the results of Low (1981) and Chan et aL (1984), however, and from unpublished results obtained recently in this laboratory, it appears that: (1) most of the exchangeable cations are adsorbed on the silicate surface in a Stem layer, (2) the values of~, the charge density at the inner boundary of the diffuse layer, and of fr, the potential at this boundary, are much smaller than the corresponding values at the silicate surface, (3) f~ is constant but ~, is variable, and (4) the electrophoretically measured ~" potential provides a good estimate of ~br. The g" potential of Li-vermiculite in 10 -4 N LiC1 is between 50 and 90 mV (Friend and Hunter, 1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more strongly hydrated monovalent cations (Li + and Na + ) were seen to bind more weakly to the negatively charged clay surface, giving rise to higher zeta potentials (in absolute values, the potentials remaining negative), while the less strongly hydrated cations (NH + 4 , Rb + , Cs + ) were seen to bind more strongly to the surface, giving rise to relatively low potentials (24,25).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%