2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:coll.0000037454.39079.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Potential at the Gas–Nonaqueous Solution Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 To the extent that this quantity has been indirectly measured at the air-water interface, early reported values strongly varied in magnitude and sign. 13 Several post-1970 experimental values are in better agreement with each other, 12,14 yielding +0.025 to 0.16 volt values (see Ref. 16, Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…2 To the extent that this quantity has been indirectly measured at the air-water interface, early reported values strongly varied in magnitude and sign. 13 Several post-1970 experimental values are in better agreement with each other, 12,14 yielding +0.025 to 0.16 volt values (see Ref. 16, Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A positive value of droplet surface potential (+0.1 V) indicates that the water dipoles are preferentially oriented with the negative pole toward the gas phase, while the positive pole is oriented towards the liquid phase (Parfenyuk, 2002). Botti et al (2004) suggested that OH − ions are hydrated with 4 H 2 O molecules with a presence of a weakly bound fifth water molecule, close to the hydrogen atoms.…”
Section: Air Ions In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact potential difference method [11] enabled us to show that, within the aforementioned concentration range, the sign of the surface potential at the solution-gas interface changes, which reflects the structure peculiarities of the solution, including that part of it close to the electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%