2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface plasmon resonance effect on charge transfer in Ag@Cu2O-rGO composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a comparison, both peak positions symbolizing Cu + in Cu 2 O@rGO redshifted, which indicates that there is an interaction between rGO and Cu 2 O [ 40 ]. Based on previous studies, a reasonable explanation is that Cu + utilized oxygen-containing functional groups of rGO as targets for the in situ growth of Cu 2 O [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a comparison, both peak positions symbolizing Cu + in Cu 2 O@rGO redshifted, which indicates that there is an interaction between rGO and Cu 2 O [ 40 ]. Based on previous studies, a reasonable explanation is that Cu + utilized oxygen-containing functional groups of rGO as targets for the in situ growth of Cu 2 O [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silver nanoparticles with SPR exhibit significantly higher absorption and scattering intensities . Photogenerated electroporation pairs can be separated at a much faster rate, and more electrons can be injected from semiconductors into noble metals, owing to the noble metal/semiconductor composite substrate, which overcomes the defects of both materials on its own and forms a Schottky barrier at the material interface. The electrons subsequently proceed quickly to Ag particles with Fermi levels of +0.4 eV versus NHE or to the energy level of g-C 3 N 4 , after which they remain there. A Schottky barrier becomes created on the Ag nanoparticles as the electrons accumulate there, thereby blocking the interaction of photogenerated electrons and holes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band gap of the Cu/TiO2 is 3.00 eV, with a further reduction observed in the case of the Ag@Cu/TiO2, measuring around 2.86 eV. The band gap reduction in the Ag@Cu/TiO2 indicates the combined effects of Ag and Cu, contributing to the enhanced electron capture through the Schottky effect and surface plasmon resonance [29]. This synergistic effect results in a narrowed…”
Section: α Hυ C Hυ 𝐸mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This efficiency further decreased to 75.54% at 400 mg/250 mL. This decline in efficiency can be attributed to the desorption and scattering of light beyond a certain threshold dosage of Ag@Cu/TiO2 [29].…”
Section: Effect Of Ag@cu/tio2 Dosagementioning
confidence: 94%