2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2020)050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface operators in superspace

Abstract: We generalize the geometrical formulation of Wilson loops recently introduced in [1] to the description of Wilson Surfaces. For N = (2, 0) theory in six dimensions, we provide an explicit derivation of BPS Wilson Surfaces with non-trivial coupling to scalars, together with their manifestly supersymmetric version. We derive explicit conditions which allow to classify these operators in terms of the number of preserved supercharges. We also discuss kappa-symmetry and prove that BPS conditions in six dimensions a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have seen from a preliminary work that the same phenomena is at work also in the present context. Feynman diagrams computations will be presented somewhere else [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have seen from a preliminary work that the same phenomena is at work also in the present context. Feynman diagrams computations will be presented somewhere else [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). In other words we have distributed the PCO Y (0|2) on the gauge fields A (1|0) 7 Care must be used in defining the product of two pseudoforms since it might lead to divergencies in the Feynman diagrams [20].…”
Section: Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our construction can be generalized to define (p|m)-integral currents, that is conserved integral forms, or more generally (p|q)-form currents with 0 < q < m described by conserved pseudo-forms. The physical meaning of this conservation laws and the corresponding exotic symmetries has still to be understood and will be discussed elsewhere [63]. Furthermore, our approach can be exploited to generalize to supermanifolds the recent formulation of a continuum field theory for probe particles and dipoles with reduced mobility (fractons and lineons) [50,51,52,53,54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, section 8 is devoted to some conclusions and perspectives. In particular, we address the fact that our construction opens the possibility of studying a continuum theory for fractons and lineons in superspace (superfractons and superlineons), as we will discuss in a forthcoming paper [63]. Four appendices follow, one summarising our conventions in six dimensions, one recalling basic definitions about the Hodge operator in supermanifolds, one including an alternative discussion of conservation laws that makes use of an explicit surface parametrization, and finally one where we define a supersymmetric version of the linking number between two supersurfaces, required to define the action of charge operators on superWS and higher dimensional objects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a supermanifold M , say of dimension n|m, differential forms in Ω • (M ) are not enough to define a coherent notion of integration on M . This leads to the introduction of integral forms, which are geometrically as important as differential forms, see [37] and the recent papers [8,6,7,25,39,9,10,11,15,16,17,18,12,3]. Loosely speaking, whereas differential forms lead to a consistent geometric integration on ordinary bosonic submanifolds (i.e.…”
Section: A Primer Of Integral Forms On Supermanifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%