“…Furthermore, the proposed method was compared with some other available methods based on MIPs or membrane extraction in the literature for PHT, PHB, and/or LTG. 28–33,47–53 As shown in Table 6, the extraction recovery of the current method for PHT in plasma was similar with that in the works by Jia's group 28 and Yaripour's group 33 but higher than that in other methods. 47,48,53 The extraction recovery of the current work for PHT in aqueous solution was obviously higher than that in the reference methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, solid-phase extraction (SPE) based on molecularly imprinted polymers has aroused comprehensive attention from scientists in the elds of environmental and biomedical analysis, [24][25][26] which has been successfully applied in the determination of PHT, PHB or LTG in environmental water, urine, serum, and plasma. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Compared with the traditional SPE column, molecularly imprinted polymer membranes (MIPMs) have received more extensive attention for the separation and extraction of target compounds in biological samples or environmental water, given that they simultaneously possess the advantages of molecularly imprinting and membrane technology, such as specic recognition, specic surface area, and convenient operation. [34][35][36][37][38] However, to the best of our knowledge, MIPMs suitable for the targeted extraction and separation of PHT, PHB, and/or LTG in different matrices have not been reported to date.…”
A molecularly imprinted polymer membrane (MIPM) was prepared using PVDF as the support and phenytoin (PHT) as a single template. The results indicated that the MIPMs can be used to extract PHT, phenobarbital, and lamotrigine in different matrices.
“…Furthermore, the proposed method was compared with some other available methods based on MIPs or membrane extraction in the literature for PHT, PHB, and/or LTG. 28–33,47–53 As shown in Table 6, the extraction recovery of the current method for PHT in plasma was similar with that in the works by Jia's group 28 and Yaripour's group 33 but higher than that in other methods. 47,48,53 The extraction recovery of the current work for PHT in aqueous solution was obviously higher than that in the reference methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, solid-phase extraction (SPE) based on molecularly imprinted polymers has aroused comprehensive attention from scientists in the elds of environmental and biomedical analysis, [24][25][26] which has been successfully applied in the determination of PHT, PHB or LTG in environmental water, urine, serum, and plasma. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Compared with the traditional SPE column, molecularly imprinted polymer membranes (MIPMs) have received more extensive attention for the separation and extraction of target compounds in biological samples or environmental water, given that they simultaneously possess the advantages of molecularly imprinting and membrane technology, such as specic recognition, specic surface area, and convenient operation. [34][35][36][37][38] However, to the best of our knowledge, MIPMs suitable for the targeted extraction and separation of PHT, PHB, and/or LTG in different matrices have not been reported to date.…”
A molecularly imprinted polymer membrane (MIPM) was prepared using PVDF as the support and phenytoin (PHT) as a single template. The results indicated that the MIPMs can be used to extract PHT, phenobarbital, and lamotrigine in different matrices.
“…HPLC-UV n.a. and 0.05 µg/mL 0.05-40 µg/mL [76] Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Cisplatin, Methotrexate, Pemetrexed disodium, Capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Doxorubicin, Fulvestrant, Tamoxifen, Irinotecan 100 µL of plasma MSPE: activation of the magnetic particles with 20 µL of hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance magnetic particles; 200 µL of methanol is transferred to a 96-well plate and stirred with a magnetic bar for 30 s; the activated magnetic particles are absorbed by the magnetic bar, transferred to another well plate and rinsed with 600 µL of water; 100 µL of the sample is added to another column of a 96-well plate and stirred with a magnetic bar for 30 s; elution of the drug-adsorbed magnetic particles that are absorbed by the magnetic bar are transferred to another well plate and rinsed with 600 µL of water for 30 s and then absorbed by the magnetic bar, transferred to a last column and rinsed with 800 µL of acetonitrile for 30 s to elute the analytes.…”
Section: Magnetic Solid-phase Extraction and Solid-phase Dynamic Extr...mentioning
Therapeutic drug monitoring is an established practice for a small group of drugs, particularly those presenting narrow therapeutic windows, for which there is a direct relationship between concentration and pharmacological effects at the site of action. Drug concentrations in biological fluids are used, in addition to other clinical observation measures, to assess the patient’s status, since they are the support for therapy individualization and allow assessing adherence to therapy. Monitoring these drug classes is of great importance, as it minimizes the risk of medical interactions, as well as toxic effects. In addition, the quantification of these drugs through routine toxicological tests and the development of new monitoring methodologies are extremely relevant for public health and for the well-being of the patient, and it has implications in clinical and forensic situations. In this sense, the use of new extraction procedures that employ smaller volumes of sample and organic solvents, therefore considered miniaturized and green techniques, is of great interest in this field. From these, the use of fabric-phase extractions seems appealing. Noteworthy is the fact that SPME, which was the first of these miniaturized approaches to be used in the early ‘90s, is still the most used solventless procedure, providing solid and sound results. The main goal of this paper is to perform a critical review of sample preparation techniques based on solid-phase microextraction for drug detection in therapeutic monitoring situations.
“…The molecularly imprinted sorbents found an application in biomedical or clinical investigations of the levels of various important biomolecules, such as biogenic amines dopamine in human urine [151], tryptamine in human cerebrospinal fluid [152], psychoactive compounds such as cocaine [153] or cannabinoids [154], estrogens [155], various drugs such as gliclazide [156], nadifloxacin [157], phenytoin [158], zolpidem [159], and pramipexole [160] among others. Finally, molecularly imprinted sorbents were also used to monitor in vivo in animal model metabolites of the pharmacologically active compounds of plant origin such as hesperetin, a flavonoid, possessing antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular protection and anti-rheumatic activities [161].…”
Section: Application Potential Of Imprinted Sorbentsmentioning
In the last 10 years, we have witnessed an extensive development of instrumental techniques in analytical methods for determination of various molecules and ions at very low concentrations. Nevertheless, the presence of interfering components of complex samples hampered the applicability of new analytical strategies. Thus, additional sample pre-treatment steps were proposed to overcome the problem. Solid sorbents were used for clean-up samples but insufficient selectivity of commercial materials limited their utility. Here, the application of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) or ion-imprinted polymers (IIPs) in the separation processes have recently attracted attention due to their many advantages, such as high selectivity, robustness, and low costs of the fabrication process. Bulk or monoliths, microspheres and core-shell materials, magnetically susceptible and stir-bar imprinted materials are applicable to different modes of solid-phase extraction to determine target analytes and ions in a very complex environment such as blood, urine, soil, or food. The capability to perform a specific separation of enantiomers is a substantial advantage in clinical analysis. The ion-imprinted sorbents gained interest in trace analysis of pollutants in environmental samples. In this review, the current synthetic approaches for the preparation of MIPs and IIPs are comprehensively discussed together with a detailed characterization of respective materials. Furthermore, the use of sorbents in environmental, food, and biomedical analyses will be emphasized to point out current limits and highlight the future prospects for further development in the field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.