2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modifications of polystyrene and their stability: A comparison of DBD plasma deposition and direct fluorination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another mechanism was also reported, i.e., a correlation of surface charges and wetting properties was found [90]. The aging of the surface modification could therefore be influenced also by the plasma-modified electrical properties of the surfaces [91,92,93].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another mechanism was also reported, i.e., a correlation of surface charges and wetting properties was found [90]. The aging of the surface modification could therefore be influenced also by the plasma-modified electrical properties of the surfaces [91,92,93].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that surface fluorination is an effective way to improve the surface flashover performance in vacuum of insulator materials [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94], including epoxy and its composite [85,93], high-density polyethylene (HDPE) [93], polystyrene (PS) [94] and other materials. Authors apply the fluorination treatment method in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) to improve the surface flashover voltages and the surface potential decay (SPD) to characterise properties of insulator surface [95].…”
Section: Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above results of the modification method to improve surface flashover performance, it is found that adjusting trap parameters can effectively improve surface flashover performance in vacuum. Some of these results show that the trap levels became shallower after insulator modification, and have a negative correlation with the surface flashover voltage [82,87,[93][94][95][96]106]. In other results, however, the trap levels become deeper after insulator modification and have a positive correlation with the surface flashover voltage [117,119,120,122,130,135,136,138,139,141,144,149].…”
Section: 'U-shaped' Dependence Of Surface Flashover Performance On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally true that surface properties of filler play a crucial part on the affinity of polymer and inorganic fillers, and there are various activation treatments applied to manipulate surface modification of inorganic materials during the past few decades including coupling agent modification, mechanical activation, thermal activation, surfactant modification, plasma treatment, and microwave activation. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Among these methods, coupling agents can change the surface wettability of materials without affecting the most properties, and it has been widely used in surface modification of inorganic matters due to easy availability and high efficiency, including silane coupling agents, titanate coupling agents, aluminate coupling agents, and rare-earth coupling agents. [20][21][22][31][32][33][34] With the excellent performance, titanate coupling agents are consumed popularly in surface treatments of numerous materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%