2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification of prototypes in fused filament fabrication using chemical vapour smoothing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also developed a mathematical model for the prediction of the average surface roughness of the treated parts. Mu et al [ 20 ] compared the effect of different mixtures of acetone and ethyl acetate to improve the surface coarseness of ABS specimens with different building orientations and concluded that the tensile strength of samples treated with the acetone or the mixed vapor decreased with increasing the exposure time. The best results in terms of mechanical performance were obtained when vapors of pure ethyl acetate were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also developed a mathematical model for the prediction of the average surface roughness of the treated parts. Mu et al [ 20 ] compared the effect of different mixtures of acetone and ethyl acetate to improve the surface coarseness of ABS specimens with different building orientations and concluded that the tensile strength of samples treated with the acetone or the mixed vapor decreased with increasing the exposure time. The best results in terms of mechanical performance were obtained when vapors of pure ethyl acetate were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface quality of the 3D printed parts has been studied in the literature for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], Micro-Stereolithography [27], Laminated Object Manufacturing [28] and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) parts [29][30][31]. Mathematical [18,21], empirical [22] and learning-based predictive [26] models have been presented, considering the 3D printing parameters [24,28], for the surface roughness of FFF parts, while nondestructive characterization methods are used to determine the surface roughness of SLS parts [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layer resettlement marks are clearly visible in SEM images. The material flows from heightened polymers layers and flows into the voids [ 33 ]. After cooling, it gets settled as smooth layers which gives high quality surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%