2022
DOI: 10.1002/masy.202100485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Modification of Polyvinyl Alcohol‐Nanocellulose Composites for Hydrophobic Self‐Cleaning Solar Panel Cover

Abstract: Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanocomposites are studied as a green alternative to counteract solar panel soiling. CNC synthesized from acid hydrolysis is blended with PVA, and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) is blended with powdered silica (SiO2) for surface modification to produce a transparent, hydrophobic, and durable film. The objective is to test the composite film for transparency, hydrophobicity, and durability to determine its suitability as a self‐cleaning solar panel cover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ma et al [31] also reported NCC reinforcement in tensile properties of the ethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA)/ NCC nanocomposites [31]. NCCs not only enhance mechanical strength but also induce other properties, such as optical transparency, to some polymeric systems compared to other microscopic fillers [32][33][34]. Although NCCs seem to have more reinforcing effects than MCC according to the literature [30,35], NCC preparations are highly time, and energy consuming, at the same time, generally require strong and toxic chemicals too, which are difficult to separate from the fibers in their pure and dry state [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [31] also reported NCC reinforcement in tensile properties of the ethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA)/ NCC nanocomposites [31]. NCCs not only enhance mechanical strength but also induce other properties, such as optical transparency, to some polymeric systems compared to other microscopic fillers [32][33][34]. Although NCCs seem to have more reinforcing effects than MCC according to the literature [30,35], NCC preparations are highly time, and energy consuming, at the same time, generally require strong and toxic chemicals too, which are difficult to separate from the fibers in their pure and dry state [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fillers may be of 0 dimensional (0D), one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D). 3D particles are cubical or spherical structures spread in x, y and z directions for instance boehmite [11], silica [12] and different kinds of particle. 2D particles are sheet-like layered particles spread in x and y directions for instance graphite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D particles are sheet-like layered particles spread in x and y directions for instance graphite. 1D particles are tubular or cylindrical in the structure such as singlewalled (SWCNT), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) whereas 0D are the quantum dots which are very minute particles comprising few atoms such as fullerenes, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) etc., [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%