2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2600-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification of PET films by atmospheric pressure plasma exposure with three reactive gas sources

Abstract: The surface modification of poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) film was carried out using an atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) jet device with three reactive gases: air, N 2 , and Ar. The water contact angles on the PET film were found to decrease considerably after the APP exposure. The changes in the advancing and receding contact angles of water on the APP-exposed PET film with aging time were examined by the wetting force measurements employing the Wilhelmy method. The hydrophobic recovery due to the rins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows advancing and receding contact angles of water on the fibers immediately after the APP treatment as a function of the distance from the nozzle jet to the fabric, D. For all fibers, both contact angles were dependent on D, and the minimum contact angle, the maximum wettability, was obtained at D = 5 mm. In the previous paper [44], similar results were obtained for the poly (ethylene terephthalate) film that was cut off to a fine strip. The PET film was often deformed for D<5 mm because of partial melting at high temperature.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Detergencysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…1 shows advancing and receding contact angles of water on the fibers immediately after the APP treatment as a function of the distance from the nozzle jet to the fabric, D. For all fibers, both contact angles were dependent on D, and the minimum contact angle, the maximum wettability, was obtained at D = 5 mm. In the previous paper [44], similar results were obtained for the poly (ethylene terephthalate) film that was cut off to a fine strip. The PET film was often deformed for D<5 mm because of partial melting at high temperature.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Detergencysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This finding is in an agreement with the XPS analysis that indicated a reduction of the surface oxygen content upon rinsing. The washed surfaces exhibit only small-size irregularities that are result from surface etching [38]. Table 3 shows the roughness of PE and PP after the plasma treatment alone and in the case of polymer treatment followed by sample washing.…”
Section: Surface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angle was measured 1 s after placing a 2-3 μL water drop on the substrates with and without the SA-LB film 18 . The measurements were repeated 6-10 times, and the standard deviations were within 10 .…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To promote the removal in aqueous NaCl or SDS solution, the APP exposure to the QCM electrode with the SA-LB films was carried out using a commercial plasma pretreatment equipment Plasmatreat GmbH, Germany consisting of a plasma generator FG1001 , high-voltage transformer HTR1001 , and rotating nozzle jet RD1004 under optimal conditions for obtaining high hydrophilicity without thermal damage 18 . The QCM frequency reduction after APP exposure was within 10 ng and was much smaller than the deposition mass of the SA-LB film.…”
Section: Effect Of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%