2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(00)00012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification of jute and its influence on performance of biodegradable jute-fabric/Biopol composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
202
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
202
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High fiber content is responsible for poor fiber matrix adhesion. Similar results are reported elsewhere for jute/polyester amide composites [14].Chemical treatment of jutefiber plays an important role on its mechanical properties. HEMA and BPO treated composites have higher values of BS than that of untreated composite.…”
Section: Bending Strength (Bs) Of the Compositessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High fiber content is responsible for poor fiber matrix adhesion. Similar results are reported elsewhere for jute/polyester amide composites [14].Chemical treatment of jutefiber plays an important role on its mechanical properties. HEMA and BPO treated composites have higher values of BS than that of untreated composite.…”
Section: Bending Strength (Bs) Of the Compositessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Benzol peroxide is an oxidizing agent and it can ionize quickly than Irgacure-184. HEMA treatment of the jute fibers decreases the hydrophilic nature of the jute which attributes higher TS over the control composites [14].…”
Section: Tensile Strength (Ts) Of the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Several researchers have attempted to improve the interfacial bonding between the natural fibers and the matrix by altering the hydrophilic nature of the fibers. Several methods to achieve this include chemical treatment, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] acetylation of the hydroxyl group of the fibers, 15 post-treating with urotropine and urea 16 and the well-known process of alkali treatment. 10,[14][15][16] Alkali treatment has the potential of improving fiber strength by removing lignin, hemicellulose, and pectin.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,25,26 There have been many research reports of the treatment of alkali on cellulose fibers and applications of these in polymer composites. 2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] For chemical treatment of cellulose, the focus has been mainly on changes of characteristics of cellulose surface by removing impurities on the cellulose fiber, which results in more hydroxyl groups (active sites) exposure on the cellulose fiber. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] There have been no published reports uses of nano-cellulose filled polymer composite for characterization because the nano-cellulose fibers has been typically obtained in lab scale thus the yield was so small not enough to put into polymer matrix.…”
Section: 폴리머 제39권 제1호 2015년mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When alkali removes impurities on natural fibers, more active sites, hydroxyl groups, which can react with other chemicals such as coupling agents or polar character homogenizers, are exposed to polymer matrix. Further treatment of nano-kenaf with NaOH triggers reaction between accessible -OH groups of the kenaf and -OH groups of the alkali according to following proposed chemical reaction 28,[33][34][35] as shown in eq. (3).…”
Section: 폴리머 제39권 제1호 2015년mentioning
confidence: 99%