2018
DOI: 10.3390/jimaging4010016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Mesh Reconstruction from Cardiac MRI Contours

Abstract: Abstract:We introduce a tool to build a surface mesh able to deal with sparse, heterogeneous, non-parallel, cross-sectional, non-coincidental contours and show its application to reconstruct surfaces of the heart. In recent years, much research has looked at creating personalised 3D anatomical models of the heart. These models usually incorporate a geometrical reconstruction of the anatomy in order to better understand cardiovascular functions as well as predict different cardiac processes. As MRIs are becomin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial misalignments in slice images and spatial discrepancies between the contours due to acquisitions at different breath holds were corrected by aligning intensity profiles of intersecting slices using a 3D rigid transformation for each image (Villard et al, 2017) (see Figure 1A, Contours alignment). Bi-ventricular geometries were built from the aligned contours using the end-diastole frames from the standard CINE acquisition as in Villard et al (2018) and Zacur et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial misalignments in slice images and spatial discrepancies between the contours due to acquisitions at different breath holds were corrected by aligning intensity profiles of intersecting slices using a 3D rigid transformation for each image (Villard et al, 2017) (see Figure 1A, Contours alignment). Bi-ventricular geometries were built from the aligned contours using the end-diastole frames from the standard CINE acquisition as in Villard et al (2018) and Zacur et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more mature methods include the triangle method, minimum surface method, shortest diagonal method, implicit function surface method, and slice-seam method. However, these are only used if the number of points m is not too different from the number of points n. When there is a big difference between m and n, the regions of the point set with fewer points correspond to multiple edges on the point set with more points, and the constructed 3D structure becomes rough, and, in some instances, even loses the characteristics of the structure itself [8][9][10][11][12]. Another method is to use the Delaunay irregular triangulation mesh to realize the segmentation and modeling of discrete data points in space [13][14][15].…”
Section: Problems In Current Surface Reconstruction Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has focused on correcting slice misalignment induced by respiratory motion between breath holds [5,6] and on reconstructing 3D surfaces from sparse and noisy input data [7,8]. In this paper, we propose a fast and fully automatic geometric deep learning method, capable of addressing both the sparsity and misalignment problem in a single model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%