1991
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(91)90473-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface melting of strained and unstrained layers: Kr, Ar, and Ne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these resulted several scientific discoveries as the effect of strain on surface morphology [9][10][11][12][13]. Such by technology stimulated studies may they be qualified as too academic ?In this paper therefore we deliberately revisited the 100 years-old academic Wulf-theorem [14,22] [17][18][19][20][21]) or in case of coherent epitaxy but with zero misfit. For 3D coherent epitaxies on a lattice-mismatched substrate the deposited crystal is strained as well as a part of the underlying substrate [10,11,29,31] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these resulted several scientific discoveries as the effect of strain on surface morphology [9][10][11][12][13]. Such by technology stimulated studies may they be qualified as too academic ?In this paper therefore we deliberately revisited the 100 years-old academic Wulf-theorem [14,22] [17][18][19][20][21]) or in case of coherent epitaxy but with zero misfit. For 3D coherent epitaxies on a lattice-mismatched substrate the deposited crystal is strained as well as a part of the underlying substrate [10,11,29,31] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first and second terms are familiar from previous considerations for smooth walls, the third term is essential for nonideal substrates. In detail, the thermodynamic part is [1,12] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is substantiated, for example, by recent experimental and theoretical studies on surface premelting [26,27], the investigation of negative thermal expansion coefficients at surfaces [28] and the observation of surface charge density waves (sCDW) [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%