2018
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201701958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface/Interfacial Catalysis of (Metal)/Oxide System: Structure and Performance Control

Abstract: Surface/interfacial catalysis on a series of oxide substrates and metal/oxide interfaces has been reviewed. Special attention has been paid to those systems in which the oxide substrates are structurally defined with certain exposed facets, and the metal assembling is well controlled with desired particle size and narrow particle size distribution. The distinct catalytic behaviors over the selected systems have been discussed in line with their specific surface/interfacial structure features as well as other s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 291 publications
(269 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11−13 On the other hand, the rapid development in synthetic chemistry of high-surface area nanomaterials of well-defined surface and interface structures during the past two decades has established a useful nanomaterial database for us to specifically engineer the surface and interface parameters of heterogeneous metal catalysts with nearly atomic precision. 14,15 Such a capability allows us to fabricate model metal catalysts to avoid the interplay of different structural parameters for understanding the key factors that determine catalytic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11−13 On the other hand, the rapid development in synthetic chemistry of high-surface area nanomaterials of well-defined surface and interface structures during the past two decades has established a useful nanomaterial database for us to specifically engineer the surface and interface parameters of heterogeneous metal catalysts with nearly atomic precision. 14,15 Such a capability allows us to fabricate model metal catalysts to avoid the interplay of different structural parameters for understanding the key factors that determine catalytic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1−3] Since the hybridization effect strongly relies on the interfacial electronic coupling between hybridized species, [1] it is necessary to maximize this interfacial interaction to optimize the various functionalities of nanohybrids. [4] The unusually high surface-to-volume ratio of conductive two dimenstional (2D) nanosheets (NSs) renders these materials highly efficient hybridization matrices via effective interfacial interactions at their wide 2D surfaces. [5,6] To date, a huge number of reports have been published regarding the exploration of efficient energy-functional hybrid materials based on hybridization with conductive 2D NSs, such as reduced graphene oxide (rGO), 1T′-MoS 2 , RuO 2 , and MXene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the activity of ceria‐based catalysts in PM oxidation, one critical factor to be considered is the morphology. The structural design at the nanoscale is critical in catalyst development . Since PM is a solid particle reactant, contact between PM and the catalyst strongly limits the reaction sites of PM oxidation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural design at the nanoscale is critical in catalyst development. [8] Since PM is a solid particle reactant, contact between PM and the catalyst strongly limits the reaction sites of PM oxidation. [9] Accordingly, an increased number of contact points enhances the catalytic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%