2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles as an effective carrier for epirubicin delivery to cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amino-propyl groups were subsequently functionalized by carboxyl groups, which led to further reduction in surface area (83 m 2 /g), as well as pore size and lower loading of exenatide shown later in the loading results. Similarly, functionalization with propyl methylphosphonate silane has been reported to reduce the surface area as is seen in the current study [43]. However, PDSNPs still had the highest available surface area among functionalized DSNPs (305 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Amino-propyl groups were subsequently functionalized by carboxyl groups, which led to further reduction in surface area (83 m 2 /g), as well as pore size and lower loading of exenatide shown later in the loading results. Similarly, functionalization with propyl methylphosphonate silane has been reported to reduce the surface area as is seen in the current study [43]. However, PDSNPs still had the highest available surface area among functionalized DSNPs (305 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Fluorescence emission from DOX was measured using a spectrofluorometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 470/590 nm. The calibration curve was drawn using serial dilutions of DOX in serum and tissue extracts of the control mice [20,21].…”
Section: ▼ Biodistribution Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen physisorption measurements (Supplementary Figure S5, Supporting Information) show an overall surface area of 695 m 2 /g, a pore volume of 1.567 cm 3 /g and a pore diameter of 2.79 nm. Although the surface area and the pore volume are low when compared to mesoporous silica nanoparticles without the Fe 3 O 4 core (typically $1000 m 2 /g and 1 cm 3 /g, respectively), these values are reasonable when taking into account the inclusion of an Fe 3 O 4 core [24,45].…”
Section: Characterization Of Fe 3 O 4 Nanoparticles and Mmsnsmentioning
confidence: 97%