2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9274-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface functionalization via in situ interaction of plasma-generated free radicals with stable precursor-molecules on cellulose

Abstract: The surface functionalization process was

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reactive plasma carboxylic functionalization using precursor molecules of the desired functionalities (e.g., acrylic acid or maleic anhydride)26, 27 are even more subject to fragmentation processes in gas (vapors) phase as a result of their interactions with the electrons and with the precursor‐derived, nascent, charged, free radicals, and neutral species; in addition to the desired functionalities, other functional groups will be simultaneously implanted onto the surfaces, reducing the specificity of the functionalization process; free radical sites (reactive surface radicals and stable, “caged” free radicals)8, 9 will initiate after plasma treatment,9, 10 non‐specific interactions with target molecules (e.g., biomolecules), which obviously will diminish significantly the molecular recognition capabilities (specificity) of the modified substrates. Possible solutions for these problems have been reported by using pulsed plasma discharges27–32 or plasma assisted macromolecules grafting 33.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reactive plasma carboxylic functionalization using precursor molecules of the desired functionalities (e.g., acrylic acid or maleic anhydride)26, 27 are even more subject to fragmentation processes in gas (vapors) phase as a result of their interactions with the electrons and with the precursor‐derived, nascent, charged, free radicals, and neutral species; in addition to the desired functionalities, other functional groups will be simultaneously implanted onto the surfaces, reducing the specificity of the functionalization process; free radical sites (reactive surface radicals and stable, “caged” free radicals)8, 9 will initiate after plasma treatment,9, 10 non‐specific interactions with target molecules (e.g., biomolecules), which obviously will diminish significantly the molecular recognition capabilities (specificity) of the modified substrates. Possible solutions for these problems have been reported by using pulsed plasma discharges27–32 or plasma assisted macromolecules grafting 33.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the plasma ON period of the cycle the fragmentation of precursor molecules can also generate unwanted or difficult to control functionalities, increasing the complexity of interactions with biomolecules for example. A non‐reactive plasma treatment can produce free radicals on the surface of polymers10 that have better chances to generate monofunctional surfaces by chemical reaction with molecule bearing desired functionalities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surface groups created by the plasma are usually chemically unstable-in-time (a phenomenon often termed "aging", or hydrophobic recovery for plasma-hydrophilized surfaces), and thus surfaces have to be used immediately after treatment. 17 For this reason, plasma-etched surfaces are less frequently used for biomolecule immobilization, 19−25 compared to plasma polymerized surfaces. 17,26−37 An exception to this rule is the work by Bilek et al, 2,38 who proposed an energetic ion-assisted plasma process (plasma immersion ion implantation) in order to produce surfaces chemically stable for months containing free radicals, which can directly immobilize biomolecules covalently on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%