Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Volume 6
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004169326.i-400.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Free Energy of Viscoelastic Thermal Compressed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 also shows that the contact angle of diiodomethane increased with thermal modifi cation of beech wood and was higher on thermally modifi ed wood at 190 ° C than at 212 ° C. In the literature there are various data for the contact angle of diiodomethane on wood, from values of more than 70° on spruce wood (Picea abies L.) and meranti wood (Shorea spp.) (De Meijer et al, 2000) to values not signifi cantly higher than 0 ° on viscoelastic thermal compressed wood (Petrič et al, 2009). From the three test liquids, the smallest dissipation of the contact angle measurements was recorded for the water.…”
Section: Determination Of Contact Angle Of Waterborne Coating 23 Odmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Table 4 also shows that the contact angle of diiodomethane increased with thermal modifi cation of beech wood and was higher on thermally modifi ed wood at 190 ° C than at 212 ° C. In the literature there are various data for the contact angle of diiodomethane on wood, from values of more than 70° on spruce wood (Picea abies L.) and meranti wood (Shorea spp.) (De Meijer et al, 2000) to values not signifi cantly higher than 0 ° on viscoelastic thermal compressed wood (Petrič et al, 2009). From the three test liquids, the smallest dissipation of the contact angle measurements was recorded for the water.…”
Section: Determination Of Contact Angle Of Waterborne Coating 23 Odmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Paavilainen and Torgilsson 1994;Syrjanen et al 1994;Nurmi 1997;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Schulze et al 2002;Stener and Hedenberg 2003;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Wagenführ 2007;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Sernek et al 2010;Günther et al 2012;Karl 2012;Viöl et al 2012;EngineeringToolBox 2013;PaperonWeb 2013) Alnus glutinosa (Kramer et al 1988;Nurmi 1997;Johansson 2000;Schulze et al 2002;Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004;Wagenführ 2007;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Kiaei and Samariha 2011;Karl 2012) Populus spp. (Boehme and Hora 1996;Diamantidis and Koukios 2000;Barsoum 2001;Deiller et al 2001;Benetka et al 2002;Laureysens et al 2003;Helle and Schleser 2004;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Rutz et al 2006;Wagenführ 2007;Trnka et al 2008;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Petrič et al 2009;Sernek et al 2010;Ráhel' et al 2011;Karampinis et al 2012;Karl 2012;...…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Populus deltoides (Ilstedt and Gullberg 1993;Boehme and Hora 1996;Liesebach et al 1999;Bungart et al 2000;Diamantidis and Koukios 2000;Woods 2008;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Petrič et al 2009;Christersson 2010;Pande and Dhiman 2010;Sannigrahi et al 2010;Sernek et al 2010;Ráhel' et al 2011;Huda et al 2012;Karl 2012) Salix spp. (Wilén et al 1996;Labrecque et al 1997;Bungart et al 2000;Diamantidis and Koukios 2000;Lässig and Močalov 2000;Barsoum 2001;Deiller et al 2001;Rutz et al 2006;Wagenführ 2007;Wilkinson et al 2007;Bridgeman et al 2008;Woods 2008;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;Kord and Kord 2011;Buček et al 2012;Karampinis et al 2012;Karl 2012;EngineeringToolBox 2013) Fraxinus excelsior (Bray 1963;Kramer et al 1988;Neirynck et al 2000;Deiller et al 2001;Mohammed-Ziegler et al 2004;Ritter et al 2005;Matthews and Mackie 2006;Petritan et al 2007;Wagenführ 2007;Kaltschmitt et al 2009;…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…The second important factor affecting the greater absorption of agents, which translates into a higher application rate, is the lower density of TM wood as a result of mass loss, which is a consequence of chemical changes occurring during modification at high temperature. Wood with a lower density is characterized by a greater surface porosity and roughness, which are increased after heat treatment [56], and has less surface free energy [57][58][59].…”
Section: Wood Density the Application Rate Of Agents And Film Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of mass loss, which is a consequence of chemical changes occurring during modification at high temperature. Wood with a lower density is characterized by a greater surface porosity and roughness, which are increased after heat treatment [56], and has less surface free energy [57][58][59].…”
Section: Wood Density the Application Rate Of Agents And Film Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%