1977
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90442-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface free energies of solid metals: Estimation from liquid surface tension measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

105
622
5
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,799 publications
(763 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
105
622
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We also in Table III give the calculated surface energies of the relaxed low index surfaces for pure Pt and pure Ni using our MEAM potentials. The calculated surface energies using the MEAM potentials agree quite well with the ab initio calculations [34][density-functional theory (DFT) with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)] and experiments [35,36]. It is noticeable that the surface energies in Table III for pure Pt and pure Ni are pretty close.…”
Section: A Development Of the Potentialssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also in Table III give the calculated surface energies of the relaxed low index surfaces for pure Pt and pure Ni using our MEAM potentials. The calculated surface energies using the MEAM potentials agree quite well with the ab initio calculations [34][density-functional theory (DFT) with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)] and experiments [35,36]. It is noticeable that the surface energies in Table III for pure Pt and pure Ni are pretty close.…”
Section: A Development Of the Potentialssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…the cohesive energy E c (eV), the equilibrium nearest-neighbor distance r e (Å), the exponential decay factor for the universal energy function α, the scaling factor for the embedding energy A, the four exponential decay factors for the atomic densities β (i) , the four weighting factors for the atomic densities t (i) , and the density scaling factor ρ 0 . b Reference [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) for Pt and Re using our MEAM potentials. For the surfaces of fcc Pt and hcp Re, the calculated surface energies using the MEAM potentials agree quite well with the ab initio calculations [37][density-functional theory (DFT) with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)] and experiments [38,39]. For both fcc and hcp phases, Pt has significantly lower surface energies than Re.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Considerationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Second, compared to SiO iron has a very high surface energy. Tyson & Miller (1977) report a value of 2123 erg cm −2 for iron at the melting point as well as a semi-empirical temperature dependence. As we have seen previously for SiO, higher values for the surface energy of the condensed phase significantly inhibit nucleation.…”
Section: Adding Iron and Magnesium To (Sio) N Nucleimentioning
confidence: 94%