1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-1946(98)00067-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface forcing over the South West Atlantic according to NCEP and ECMWF reanalyses over the period 1979–1990

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general for a given location the difference between summer and winter cloud cover is lower than 10%. Similar spatiotemoral cloudiness pattern in the SWA was described by Escoffier and Provost [1998]. On the basis of the low differences in cloud cover between seasons described above, we consider that frontal characteristics (defined further in this section) are not affected by the seasonal cloud cover variability.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general for a given location the difference between summer and winter cloud cover is lower than 10%. Similar spatiotemoral cloudiness pattern in the SWA was described by Escoffier and Provost [1998]. On the basis of the low differences in cloud cover between seasons described above, we consider that frontal characteristics (defined further in this section) are not affected by the seasonal cloud cover variability.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, the winter SST reveals little temperature contrast with the MC. This could be due to the fact that the Malvinas return flow is located in a region of maximum winter heat loss to the atmosphere [ Escoffier and Provost , 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that the difference between summer and winter cloud cover is lower than 10%. Using NCEP (National Center of Environmental Prediction) and ECWMF (European Centre for Medium Weather Forecasting) reanalysis in the SWA, Escoffier and Provost [1998] find similar low seasonal variability in cloud cover. Thus we consider that the seasonal cloud cover variability does not affect the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The main ventilation window for the subtropical gyre is the Brazil Current overshoot, which corresponds to a local maximum of the net heat loss from the ocean to the atmosphere (Figure 6e) and to a local maximum of the net heat flux interannual variability [Escoffier and Provost, 1998]. The O-S diagrams obtained during the different confluence cruises document the variety of subtropical mode water vintages in the main ventilation window (Figures 3 and 7a-7c).…”
Section: Interannual Variability Of Stmws In the Brazil Current Oversmentioning
confidence: 92%