2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.08822
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface finite element approximation of spherical Whittle--Matérn Gaussian random fields

Abstract: Spherical Matérn-Whittle Gaussian random fields are considered as solutions to fractional elliptic stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere. Approximation is done with surface finite elements. While the non-fractional part of the operator is solved by a recursive scheme, a quadrature of the Dunford-Taylor integral representation is employed for the fractional part. Strong error analysis is performed, obtaining polynomial convergence in the white noise approximation, exponential convergence in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for some parameters κ > 0, β > 1/2. Note in particular, that the conditionβ > 1/2 is in accordance with Condition (34) in Theorem 5.4 and that the parameter β is directly linked to the smoothness of the resulting field, which is ν − 1 times differentiable in the mean-square sense, when taking ν = (2β − 1) (Jansson et al, 2021). As for the parameter κ, it can be interpreted as a scaling parameter.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for some parameters κ > 0, β > 1/2. Note in particular, that the conditionβ > 1/2 is in accordance with Condition (34) in Theorem 5.4 and that the parameter β is directly linked to the smoothness of the resulting field, which is ν − 1 times differentiable in the mean-square sense, when taking ν = (2β − 1) (Jansson et al, 2021). As for the parameter κ, it can be interpreted as a scaling parameter.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On top of the standard Galerkin error, this approach exhibits an additional geometric consistency error due to the fact that the manifold is approximated by a polyhedral surface. Even though we did not explicitly study this additional error, evidence suggest that Assumption 5.1, which is used to derive the convergence rates, still holds in this case: indeed, Bonito et al (2018) derived error estimates on the approximation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors using SFEM and the convergence analysis of Jansson et al (2021) shows convergence orders similar to those we derived. We also apply in this numerical experiment the mass lumping approximation described in Section 4.3.2.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation