2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface finish classification using depth camera data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 On the other hand, surface roughness is itself also an important characteristic of the scanned objects. [8][9][10][11] Conventional optical techniques for independent roughness measurement such as interferometry or confocal microscopy are usually restricted to lab conditions and small working areas. In many practical applications involving large scenes or surfaces whose roughness needs to be assessed remotely, they are thus not applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 On the other hand, surface roughness is itself also an important characteristic of the scanned objects. [8][9][10][11] Conventional optical techniques for independent roughness measurement such as interferometry or confocal microscopy are usually restricted to lab conditions and small working areas. In many practical applications involving large scenes or surfaces whose roughness needs to be assessed remotely, they are thus not applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The impact of surface roughness weakens accurate material information extraction from the reflectance spectrum. Conversely, surface roughness information of different building components is valuable for quality control in construction 10,19 and degradation assessment of construction materials. 11,20 Therefore, decoupling the impacts of material composition and surface roughness on the reflectance spectrum measured by multispectral LiDAR is highly beneficial to extract rich and accurate material information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, surface roughness is itself also an important characteristic of the scanned objects 8 11 Conventional optical techniques for independent roughness measurement, such as interferometry or confocal microscopy, are limited to small working areas. In many practical applications involving large scenes or surfaces whose roughness needs to be assessed remotely, they are thus not applicable 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the typical measurement ranges up to a few meters and required accuracies at the mm level, the latter is driving a new generation of ToF cameras (see e.g. Helios Lucid [8]) with increased potential in new application domains such as, e.g., geodetic and industrial metrology [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%