“…Furthermore, although it is widely accepted that oxide dissolution rates vary with the degree of surface charging arising from Brønsted acid-base reactions involving surface functional groups (Stumm et al, 1983Schindler and Stumm, 1987;Wieland et al, 1988;Casey et al, 1990;Stumm, 1992;Dove, 1994;e.g., Casey and Ludwig, 1996;Stumm, 1997;Brantley, 2004;Mielczarski and Pokrovskii, 2006), it is notoriously difficult to determine the speciation of individual types of functional groups on complex surfaces (Rustad, 2001(Rustad, , 2005Rustad et al, 2003;Bickmore et al, 2004Bickmore et al, , 2006bRustad and Felmy, 2005;Rustad and Casey, 2006). These practical problems have led some researchers to propose dissolution models related more to classical crystal growth theory than TST (Lasaga and Luttge, 2001, 2003, 2004a,b, 2005Lü ttge et al, 2003;Dove et al, 2005;Lü ttge, 2006;Dove and Han, 2007;Bandstra and Brantley, 2008;Zhang and Lü ttge, 2008). These approaches emphasize the influence of microscopic features of the mineral-solution interface such as surface topography and the Gibbs free energy required to open etch pits, and ignore the influence of molecular-scale details such as surface speciation.…”