2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Engineering of Quantum Dots for Remarkably High Detectivity Photodetectors

Abstract: Ternary alloyed CdSe Te colloidal QDs trap-passivated by iodide-based ligands (TBAI) are developed as building blocks for UV-NIR photodetectors. Both the few surface traps and high loading of QDs are obtained by in situ ligand exchange with TBAI. The device is sensitive to a broad wavelength range covering the UV-NIR region (300-850 nm), showing an excellent photoresponsivity of 53 mA/W, a fast response time of ≪0.02s, and remarkably high detectivity values of 8 × 10 Jones at 450 nm and 1 × 10 Jones at 800 nm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The V TFL values of CISe QD film and perovskite film are 0.68 and 0.14 V, respectively. Herein, the n trap can be expressed by the following formula [ 23–27 ] ntrap=2εε0VTFLeL2 here, ε is the relative dielectric constant of CISe QDs or perovskite, ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, e is the elementary charge, and L is the thickness of the active film. The n trap of CISe QD film and perovskite film can be calculated as 4.0 × 10 16 and 2.7 × 10 16 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The V TFL values of CISe QD film and perovskite film are 0.68 and 0.14 V, respectively. Herein, the n trap can be expressed by the following formula [ 23–27 ] ntrap=2εε0VTFLeL2 here, ε is the relative dielectric constant of CISe QDs or perovskite, ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, e is the elementary charge, and L is the thickness of the active film. The n trap of CISe QD film and perovskite film can be calculated as 4.0 × 10 16 and 2.7 × 10 16 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current density downtrend of the device under 100 mW cm −2 is attributed to surface defects of QDs that would cause charge accumulation. [ 24,32 ] Different current densities of the devices under various light intensity indicate that the devices contain different light obligation. At the light power intensity of 100 mW cm −2 , the photocurrent of DALPD is 2.5 times that of the perovskite device (Figure 4b), which shows that DALPD has stronger optical sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower dark current will also result in a faster response speed and high detectivity. 32,33 Responsivity (R) is a measure of the current output per optical input and is a key factor that determines the device sensitivity. 34,35 From Figure 2c, the responsivities of the double HTL-based device for excitation at wavelengths of 350 nm, 450 nm and 800 nm at a power of 100 mW/cm 2 are 37.0, 41.5 and 10.5 mA/W, respectively, which are 1.8, 4.0 and 3.5 times larger than those of the single HTL-based device.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV-photodetectors received great scientific attention owing to their significant commercial applications including water treatment, defense safety 1 , flame detection, and space communication 25 . The commercially used silicon-based photodetector faces a major problem of low photon absorption capability in the Ultraviolet (UV) region due to its high reflection co-efficient 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%