2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-021-03591-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Engineering of CeO2 Catalysts: Differences Between Solid Solution Based and Interfacially Designed Ce1−xMxO2 and MO/CeO2 (M = Zn, Mn) in CO2 Hydrogenation Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were formed as nanocrystalline powders with crystallite sizes less than 5 nm [88]. A 10% Zn-containing CeO 2 was found to be an effective catalyst for the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction, ascribed to the highest level of Ce 3+ defects [89]. Although not an elemental substitution, the formation of ZnO-CeO 2 heterojunctions by hydrothermal synthesis has also been studied, where the purposeful growth of the two phases in intimate contact leads to superior visible-light photocatalytic performance [90].…”
Section: Main Group Substituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were formed as nanocrystalline powders with crystallite sizes less than 5 nm [88]. A 10% Zn-containing CeO 2 was found to be an effective catalyst for the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction, ascribed to the highest level of Ce 3+ defects [89]. Although not an elemental substitution, the formation of ZnO-CeO 2 heterojunctions by hydrothermal synthesis has also been studied, where the purposeful growth of the two phases in intimate contact leads to superior visible-light photocatalytic performance [90].…”
Section: Main Group Substituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 53 ] The loading of different oxides of Mn on CeO 2 caused the peak shift of CeO 2 towards the higher temperature due to the decreased oxygen mobility. [ 54 ] The lower temperature peak was observed in the MnO 2 /CeO 2 ‐NR catalyst at 359°C, which is lower than that observed in the MnO/CeO 2 ‐NR (437°C) and Mn 2 O 3 /CeO 2 ‐NR (391°C) catalysts. Therefore, it is evident that among all catalysts, the MnO 2 /CeO 2 ‐NR catalyst exhibits the highest redox abilities at the lowest temperature as also validated by the XPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When MnO x was introduced, the interaction between Mn 4+ /Mn 3+ and Ce 4+ /Ce 3+ allowed the MnO x / CeO 2 samples to trap and release oxygen efficiently. [54,55] Table 3 shows the amount of hydrogen consumed by the samples in the H 2 -TPR experiments. In all these data, the MnO/CeO 2 -NR showed the lowest hydrogen consumption while MnO 2 /CeO 2 -NR catalyst exhibited highest hydrogen consumption.…”
Section: Hydrogen-temperatureprogrammed Reduction (H 2 -Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overtones of gas-phase CO 2 and OH bonds were observed between 3590 and 3730 cm −1 in both CeO 2 and CZLNS compounds. 63 A broad band in the 1600−800 cm −1 range corresponds to intense C−O vibration modes associated with surface carbonates, carboxylates, formates, and alkoxides. Vibrations related to C−H bonds were detected between 2800 and 3000 cm −1 , with a minor peak at 2858 cm −1 attributed to C−H vibrations of surface formate species, 63 although gas phase CH 4 was not visible as it typically emerges at higher reaction temperatures (>250 °C).…”
Section: = ( )( )mentioning
confidence: 99%