Surface Engineering of a Bioartificial Membrane for Its Application in Bioengineering Devices

Abstract

Membrane technology is playing a crucial role in cutting-edge innovations in the biomedical field. One such innovation is the surface engineering of a membrane for enhanced longevity, efficient separation, and better throughput. Hence, surface engineering is widely used while developing membranes for its use in bioartificial organ development, separation processes, extracorporeal devices, etc. Chemical-based surface modifications are usually performed by functional group/biomolecule grafting, surface moiety modification, and altercation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties. Further, creation of micro/nanogrooves, pillars, channel networks, and other topologies is achieved to modify physio-mechanical processes. These surface modifications facilitate improved cellular attachment, directional migration, and communication among the neighboring cells and enhanced diffusional transport of nutrients, gases, and waste across the membrane. These modifications, apart from improving functional efficiency, also help in overcoming fouling issues, biofilm formation, and infection incidences. Multiple strategies are adopted, like lysozyme enzymatic action, topographical modifications, nanomaterial coating, and antibiotic/antibacterial agent doping in the membrane to counter the challenges of biofilm formation, fouling challenges, and microbial invasion. Therefore, in the current review, we have comprehensibly discussed different types of membranes, their fabrication and surface modifications, antifouling/ antibacterial strategies, and their applications in bioengineering. Thus, this review would benefit bioengineers and membrane scientists who aim to improve membranes for applications in tissue engineering, bioseparation, extra corporeal membrane devices, wound healing, and others.

Vibration Analysis of Nanopillared Chitosan Membrane Using HighFrequency Excitation Technique during Solvent Casting Method

“…In addition, the potential use of nanopillars in membranes and films has received considerable attention [2]. Because nanopillars increase surface area, nanopillar surfaces are more valuable than conventional flat surfaces [3]. Due to the promise of nanopillar membranes and films for the creation of protective skin barriers [4], it is important to investigate fabrication technologies that involve the control of the geometry of nanopillars.…”

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes for Vascular Stent Coating: Manufacturing, Biomedical and Surgical Applications, Innovations and Case Reports

“…Today, one of the advantages of enhancing the properties of e-PTFE and making them favourable for coating vascular stents is their chemical functionalization through the formation of covalent and non-covalent bonds, with drugs and/or substances that can prevent the process of restenosis, bacterial infections, etc. [ 47 ]. In particular, chemical impregnation, chemical surface modification, autologous vascularisation and cell seeding can be promoted [ 48 , 49 ].…”

Composite Aerogel Scaffolds Containing Flexible Silica Nanofiber and Tricalcium Phosphate Enable Skin Regeneration

“…23 However, despite the abovementioned advantages, SiO 2 fiber−aerogels exhibit poor biodegradability alongside the lack of collagen production ability, which may limit their application prospect for tissue repair. 24 Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) has been widely used as a bone graft substitute for osteochondral tissue regeneration and shown to simultaneously promote angiogenesis and osteogenesis alongside a higher dissolution rate and absorption. 25,26 Moreover, the TCP could efficiently release therapeutic ions, such as calcium ions (Ca 2+ ), which may enhance the phosphorylation of platelet protein by protein kinase C (PKC) as well as trigger intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways.…”

“…Liu et al fabricated a magnesium-doped silica bioactive glass (SiO 2 /MgO) nanofiber membrane . However, despite the above-mentioned advantages, SiO 2 fiber–aerogels exhibit poor biodegradability alongside the lack of collagen production ability, which may limit their application prospect for tissue repair …”