2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface EMG based handgrip force predictions using gene expression programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The onset of one drawing trial is designated as the onset of feature extraction. As a time domain feature, the Root Mean Square (RMS) represents the characteristic of the amplitude change of EMG signals on the time dimension, which can nondestructively measure the state of muscle activity in real-time (Yang et al, 2016 ). The RMS is also widely accepted (Shrirao et al, 2009 ; Tang et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The onset of one drawing trial is designated as the onset of feature extraction. As a time domain feature, the Root Mean Square (RMS) represents the characteristic of the amplitude change of EMG signals on the time dimension, which can nondestructively measure the state of muscle activity in real-time (Yang et al, 2016 ). The RMS is also widely accepted (Shrirao et al, 2009 ; Tang et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, on account of the characteristics of simplicity, high efficiency, and functional complexity, GEP combines the advantages of both GAs and GP, while overcoming some of their limitations, which offers great potentiality to solve complex modeling and optimization problems (Zhou et al, 2003 ). Moreover, after the training process, GEP can produce simple explicit formulas with high accuracy (Landeras et al, 2012 ) and reduce the number of sEMG features (Yang et al, 2016 ). In addition, our proposed GEP model showed promise for recognizing sketching based on sEMG signals (Yang and Chen, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were applied to classify the normal and compensatory movement patterns (trunk lean forward, trunk rotation and shoulder elevation) during three basic seated reaching tasks, including side-to-side, back-and-forth, and up-and-down reaching. Furthermore, the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, which can reflect the degree of activity of the muscles [28], was used to provide a more detailed description of compensatory movements and verify the classification results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be found that the proposed GEP classifier presented the highest accuracy and robust when compared with the BPNN classifier and the ENN classifier. One of the advantages of the GEP classifier is that it can produce simple explicit formulations (Landeras et al, 2012 ; Yang et al, 2016 ), which gives a better understanding of the derived relationship between the sEMG signals and one-stroke sketching shapes and makes the model suitable for application in real time. Although the ENN classifier achieved higher accuracy rate than the BPNN classifier in our previous work (Chen et al, 2015 ), it performed worst in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%