2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS 2013
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2013.6723173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface elevation changes of glaciers derived from SRTM and TanDEM-X DEM differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ from the study by Willis and others [7] since we use no penetration depth correction for the SRTM C-band data. In contrast to those authors and in line with Abdel Jaber [40,41] we consider surface melt conditions for almost the entire SPI during SRTM acquisition and hence no signal penetration. Our TDX data from the austral summer 2015/16 show similar surface conditions as the careful inspection of the SAR intensity imagery revealed.…”
Section: Elevation and Mass Changes Of The Entire Spimentioning
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differ from the study by Willis and others [7] since we use no penetration depth correction for the SRTM C-band data. In contrast to those authors and in line with Abdel Jaber [40,41] we consider surface melt conditions for almost the entire SPI during SRTM acquisition and hence no signal penetration. Our TDX data from the austral summer 2015/16 show similar surface conditions as the careful inspection of the SAR intensity imagery revealed.…”
Section: Elevation and Mass Changes Of The Entire Spimentioning
confidence: 41%
“…This is caused by the interferometric approach of our study while in the optical ASTER datasets cloudy pixels or correlation mismatches remain in bright areas of the accumulation areas, which might not have been filtered out sufficiently by the time series analysis. The most pronounced surface lowering rates of Jorge Montt and Upsala as well as HPS12 Glacier have been noted by previous studies as well [7,41]. Those are most likely caused by dynamic adjustments to the fast retreat of their glacier fronts.…”
Section: Elevation and Mass Changes Of The Entire Spimentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its shorter wavelength, the X-band must have a lower penetration in snow and ice than the C-band (Surdyk, 2002b). Stuefer et al (2007) found a small elevation difference between SRTM band-C and GPS measurements on Perito Moreno glacier and Jaber et al (2013) found that firn in the accumulation area of the southern Patagonian ice field was wet during the acquisition of SRTM, which inhibits the penetration of the radar signal. Since Monte Tronador is located further north it is reasonable to assume that the firn in the accumulation area was also wet due to surface melting, inhibiting the penetration of the X-band.…”
Section: Study Area and Climatic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardelle et al, 2013). Due to the low penetration of X-band in snow/ice wet surface (Jaber et al, 2013;Rignot et al, 2001;Stuefer et al, 2007), we discarded any significant bias associated with it. We determined the horizontal and vertical shifts of the DEMs using the universal co-registration method of Nuth and Kääb (2011).…”
Section: Adjustment and Correction Of Dem Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%