Surface Electromyography Based Core Muscle Fatigue Analysis During Repetitive Plank Using Multivariate Dimensionality Reduction Methods in Boys Aged 12-14

Abstract

The aims of the study were: 1. To analyse the discriminative power of neuromuscular components for classifying the pre and post muscle fatigued states. 2. To examine whether the modification of neural recruitment strategies become more/less heterogeneous due to fatigue. 3. To research the effect of Erector Spinae (ES) muscle activity collectively with Rectus Abdominis (RA) and External Oblique (EO) muscle activity to identify the reduced spine stability during fatiguing Plank. 
 Material and methods. Twelve boys (age – 12-14 years, height 148.75 ± 10 cm, body mass 38.9 ± 7.9 kg) participated in the study. Multivariate Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were applied to identify the changes in the pattern of the electromyographic signals during muscle fatigue. In DA the Wilks’ lambda, p-value, canonical correlation, classification percentage and structure matrix were used. To evaluate the component validity the standard limit for Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) was set at ≥0.529 and the p-value of Bartlett’s test was ≤0.001. The eigenvalues ≥1 were used to determine the number of Principal Components (PCs). The satisfactory percentage of non-redundant residuals were set at ≤50% with standard value >0.05. The absolute value of average communality (x̄ h2) and component loadings were set at ≥0.6, ≥0.4 respectively. 
 Results. Standardized canonical discriminant analysis showed that pre and post fatigued conditions were significantly different (p = 0.000, Wilks’ lambda = 0.297, χ2 = 24.914, df=3). The structure matrix showed that the parameter that correlated highly with the discriminant function was ES ARV (0.514). The results showed that the classification accuracy was 95.8% between fatigued conditions. In PCA the KMO values were reduced [0.547Pre fatigue vs. 0.264Post fatigue]; the value of Bartlett’s sphericity test was in pre χ2 = 90.72 (p = 0.000) and post fatigue χ2 = 85.32 (p = 0.000); The Promax criterion with Kaiser Normalization was applied because the component rotation was non-orthogonal [Component Correlation Matrix (rCCM) = 0.520 Pre fatigue >0.3Absolute<0.357Post fatigue]. In pre fatigue two PCs (cumulative s2 – 80.159%) and post fatigue three PCs (cumulative s2 – 83.845%) had eigenvalues ≥1. The x̄ h2 increased [0.802 Pre fatigue vs. 0.838 Post fatigue] and the percentage of nonredundant residuals reduced [50% Pre fatigue vs. 44% Post fatigue] from pre to post fatigue. 
 Conclusions. The variability and heterogeneity increase in the myoelectric signals due to fatigue. The co-activity of antagonist ES muscle is significantly sensitive to identify the deteriorating spine stability during the fatiguing Plank. Highly correlated motor unit recruitment strategies between ES and RA, providing supportive evidence to the concept of shared agonist-antagonist motoneuron pool or “Common Drive” phenomenon during fatigue.

Discriminant Analysis: the Influence of Exercise Modes on the Effectiveness of the Process of Learning to Throw A Small Ball for 9-Year-Old Boys

“…The data obtained complement the information on the influence of exercise regimes on the formation of motor skills in children (Ivashchenko, 2020;Ivashchenko, Iermakov, Khudolii, Cretu, & Potop, 2017;Ivashchenko, Khudolii, Iermakov, Chernenko, & Holovko, 2015; on the effectiveness of using the method algorithmic prescriptions for the formation of motor skills (Ivashchenko, 2020;Yunak et al, 2022;Marchenko et al, 2022), and also confirm data on the effectiveness of using discriminant analysis to optimize the process of physical education of schoolchildren (Samanta & Mukherjee, 2021;Djordjevic, Valkova, & Petkovic, 2021;Begu, Miftari, Dalip, & Haxhnikaj, 2023).…”

Electromyographical Analysis of The Thigh Muscle During Four Yogasana

“…DE/ CA37/POL044A4) was used for sEMG signal processing and raw data analysis. The Bipolar (20 mm inter-electrode space) EMG/ECG Surface electrodes (Ag/AgCl sensors) were placed on VS, VL, BF, ST, muscle and the ground electrode was placed over the midline of the Distal tibiofibular bony landmark (Samanta & Mukherjee, 2021).…”