2008
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/102/1/012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface dosimetry in a CT scanner using MOSFET detectors and Monte Carlo simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MOSFETs have unique advantages as dosimeters in that they are small in size, simple to use, and provide immediate dose measurement. MOSFETs can be used for patient surface CT dosimetry, 1,2 or more commonly, with anthropomorphic phantoms for the measurement of organ dosimetry [3][4][5][6][7] and projection of radiation risk for a given CT examination. 3,4 This is of particular significance for pediatric diagnostic examinations, given the higher radiosensitivity of children, which is of particular interest at our institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MOSFETs have unique advantages as dosimeters in that they are small in size, simple to use, and provide immediate dose measurement. MOSFETs can be used for patient surface CT dosimetry, 1,2 or more commonly, with anthropomorphic phantoms for the measurement of organ dosimetry [3][4][5][6][7] and projection of radiation risk for a given CT examination. 3,4 This is of particular significance for pediatric diagnostic examinations, given the higher radiosensitivity of children, which is of particular interest at our institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increased use of MOSFET detectors for CT dosimetry, no standard calibration methodology has been identified nor expected calibration uncertainty quantified. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) compare MOS-FET calibration techniques found in the literature to determine equivalence or difference of calibration coefficient magnitude and precision; (2) determine greatest achievable calibration precision as a function of detector exposure and determine which detector exposure level provides the maximum benefit of calibration precision versus loss of lifetime dosimetry capacity; (3) finally, determine if waiting 5 min versus 0 min for signal equilibration has any effect on calibration precision and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOSFETs have been used to assess surface dose (Verhaegen et al 2008) or, in an anthropomorphic phantom, to assess organ dose (Jones et al 2005, Yoshizumi et al 2007, Hurwitz et al 2007a, 2007b and to project radiation risk (Hurwitz et al 2007a(Hurwitz et al , 2007b In vivo skin dosimetry requires a dosimeter with a reproducible WED, close to the 7 mg cm −2 23 recommended by the ICRP (1992). The advantage of MOSFETs for skin dosimetry was demonstrated by Butson et al (1996), who used bare n-type MOSFETs, without any build up above the gate, placed in a phantom holder using wax to fill air cavities.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of surface dose portrays a greater technical challenge since the distance to the superficial layer is small. MOSFET with a very small size and ease of use make them excellent candidates for clinical patient measurements [2]. The dose to the surface mainly depends on the field size, source to skin distance (SSD), beam energy, beam angle, and beam modifiers such as multileaf collimator (MLC), block systems, and types of beam used to treat the tumor [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%