2016
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.181648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the central axis dose in the build-up region and the surface dose of a 6 MV and 10 MV flattened photon beam (FB) and flattening filter free (FFF) therapeutic photon beam for different square field sizes (FSs) for a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator using parallel-plate ionization chamber and Gafchromic film. Knowledge of dosimetric characteristics in the build-up region and surface dose of the FFF is essential for clinical care. The dose measurements were also obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum surface dose in maximum field size 30x30 cm 2 for 6FF is 52.84 ± 0.011 (LA1) in SSD setup and 51.68 ± 0.005 (LA1) in SAD setup. For 6FFF the maximum to the surface dose (Sigamani et al, 2016). In general, there is no model in treatment planning system accurately accounting for surface dose measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum surface dose in maximum field size 30x30 cm 2 for 6FF is 52.84 ± 0.011 (LA1) in SSD setup and 51.68 ± 0.005 (LA1) in SAD setup. For 6FFF the maximum to the surface dose (Sigamani et al, 2016). In general, there is no model in treatment planning system accurately accounting for surface dose measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin doses were measured using a Gafchromic EBT3 film (Ashland Inc, New Jersey, USA) from 5 cm inside the medial edge of the medial beam and across the contralateral breast. Gafchromic films have been shown to be suitable for accurate skin dosimetry 18, 19. Again, the measurements were repeated six times for reproducibility and uncertainty analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, accurate measurement of dose at the surface and in the build-up region is a difficult task involving a specific type of dosimeters and procedures. [7][8][9][10][11][12] However, applying a bolus over phantom surface reduces or removes build-up region and enhances the accuracy of a measurement obtained using an ordinary ionisation chamber available in the clinical environment for radiation dosimetry and quality assurance measurements. The impact of air-gaps under a bolus on the dose distribution is one of the major challenges in photon beam external radiation therapy, but it is nevertheless essential for proper treatment patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%