2006
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/39/21/s52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface divergences and boundary energies in the Casimir effect

Abstract: Abstract. Although Casimir, or quantum vacuum, forces between distinct bodies, or self-stresses of individual bodies, have been calculated by a variety of different methods since 1948, they have always been plagued by divergences. Some of these divergences are associated with the volume, and so may be more or less unambiguously removed, while other divergences are associated with the surface. The interpretation of these has been quite controversial. Particularly mysterious is the contradiction between finite t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the integral over all space of the total energy density (electric plus magnetic) vanishes, as shown by Eq. (19), is consistent with the vanishing value of the field energy as obtained by taking the average value of the field Hamiltonian in (11) on the dressed ground state (12). If the singular terms in r = 0 in (17) and (18) containing the delta function and its derivatives were neglected (that is, considering only the usual r −7 terms), the space integral of the field energy would have been diverging due to its behavior at r = 0; in such a case, a sharp inconsistency between local and global self-energy would have appeared.…”
Section: Singular Behaviour Of the Field Energy Density Near A Psupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The fact that the integral over all space of the total energy density (electric plus magnetic) vanishes, as shown by Eq. (19), is consistent with the vanishing value of the field energy as obtained by taking the average value of the field Hamiltonian in (11) on the dressed ground state (12). If the singular terms in r = 0 in (17) and (18) containing the delta function and its derivatives were neglected (that is, considering only the usual r −7 terms), the space integral of the field energy would have been diverging due to its behavior at r = 0; in such a case, a sharp inconsistency between local and global self-energy would have appeared.…”
Section: Singular Behaviour Of the Field Energy Density Near A Psupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These divergences are a consequence of the oversimplification of a model where the physical interactions are replaced by the imposition of boundary conditions for all modes of a fluctuating quantum field. Of course, this is an idealization, as real physical systems cannot constrain all the modes (for a discussion of surface divergences and their physical interpretation see [1][2][3][4][5][6][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] and references therein). The appearance of divergences in the VEVs of physical quantities indicates that a more realistic physical model should be employed for their evaluation on the boundaries.…”
Section: Vacuum Currents In the Geometry Of A Single Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A controversial issue concerns with the appearance of surface divergences (and their cut-off dependence) in the calculation of field energy densities, in the presence of metallic boundary conditions [17][18][19][20][21]. The physical origin of these divergences has been recently questioned in the literature and the possibility of removing them through a suitable regularization procedure has been discussed in the case of a scalar field [19,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%