2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.102848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface design of nanocarriers: Key to more efficient oral drug delivery systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 212 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NS@lipid-PEG/CKC (0.02%) with higher positive zeta potential showed higher cellular uptake by HCECs at 4 and 6 h (Figure A). According to the literature, the positively charged nanomedicine may be electrostatically attracted by the negatively charged cell membrane, leading to increased membrane fluidity and membrane wrapping. , Furthermore, the cellular uptake of the positively charged nanomedicine is predominantly through micropinocytosis, which might also be true for NS@lipid-PEG/CKC reported here, whereas the negatively charged nanomedicine is suggested to be taken up via clathrin-/caveolae-independent endocytosis. , The specific cellular uptake mechanism of NS@lipid-PEG/CKC will be explored in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…NS@lipid-PEG/CKC (0.02%) with higher positive zeta potential showed higher cellular uptake by HCECs at 4 and 6 h (Figure A). According to the literature, the positively charged nanomedicine may be electrostatically attracted by the negatively charged cell membrane, leading to increased membrane fluidity and membrane wrapping. , Furthermore, the cellular uptake of the positively charged nanomedicine is predominantly through micropinocytosis, which might also be true for NS@lipid-PEG/CKC reported here, whereas the negatively charged nanomedicine is suggested to be taken up via clathrin-/caveolae-independent endocytosis. , The specific cellular uptake mechanism of NS@lipid-PEG/CKC will be explored in future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…So far, numerous nanoparticle‐based systems such as polymeric nanoparticles, lipid‐based nanoparticles (LNPs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been developed for oral nucleic acid delivery. Nucleic acids are encapsulated and protected in nanoparticles, which frees them from degradation in physiological environments 8,11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acids are encapsulated and protected in nanoparticles, which frees them from degradation in physiological environments. 8,11 The increasing global attention on nucleic acid delivery systems has led to innovations in overcoming various biological barriers. 12 Current nucleic acid therapeutic delivery systems can be broadly divided into virus-based carriers and non-viral carriers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique involves the attachment of polymers and ligands to the outer layer of nanoparticles, which reduces their interaction with mucus components and facilitates their movement within the mucus environment. 15 Various methods have been explored to improve nanoparticle penetration through the intestinal mucus layer. These methods include surface modification through PEGylation, the attachment of mucuspenetrating peptides, conjugation with ligands that bind to specific receptors on the mucosal surface, and optimization of size and surface charge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface modification of nanoparticles represents a promising approach for enhancing their ability to penetrate mucus. This technique involves the attachment of polymers and ligands to the outer layer of nanoparticles, which reduces their interaction with mucus components and facilitates their movement within the mucus environment . Various methods have been explored to improve nanoparticle penetration through the intestinal mucus layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%