2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29859-3_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Defect Modelling Using Co-occurrence Matrix and Fast Fourier Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filter-based methods apply some filter banks on defect images, and calculate the energy of the filter responses [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Common filter-based methods include Sobel operator, Canny operator, Gabor operator, Laplacian operator, wavelet transform, and Fourier transform, which can be further divided into spatial domain, frequency domain, and spatial-frequency domain methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter-based methods apply some filter banks on defect images, and calculate the energy of the filter responses [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Common filter-based methods include Sobel operator, Canny operator, Gabor operator, Laplacian operator, wavelet transform, and Fourier transform, which can be further divided into spatial domain, frequency domain, and spatial-frequency domain methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For defect detection in steel surface images, traditional ML techniques have shown reliable results in many cases [17]. Due to the small size of datasets, Iker et al, have used traditional ML techniques which are k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Bayesian networks, Support Vector Machines (SVM) and decision trees for defects classification of surface of iron casting images [21]. For feature extraction from the images, the authors have used Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) and Co-occurrence Matrix methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design feature-based methods include statistical methods (histograms [3], cooccurrence matrices [4], local binary patterns [5]), structural methods (morphology [6]), filtering methods [7,8] (Canny, Gabor, FFT, Wavelet, Sobel, etc. ), model-based methods [9], and multi-feature combination methods [10]. However, design feature-based methods often require professionals to tailor them for specific tasks, making them unsuitable for transfer applications and with limited resistance to interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%