2003
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/16/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface critical behaviour atm-axial Lifshitz points: continuum models, boundary conditions and two-loop renormalization group results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we have extended previous field-theoretic work on boundary critical behaviour at m-axial LPs [15,16,17,22] by studying the critical behaviour at the ordinary transition of a semi-infinite system that is bounded by a surface perpendicular to an α-direction. This geometry was the one considered in the earliest investigations [20,21] of boundary critical behaviour at LPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we have extended previous field-theoretic work on boundary critical behaviour at m-axial LPs [15,16,17,22] by studying the critical behaviour at the ordinary transition of a semi-infinite system that is bounded by a surface perpendicular to an α-direction. This geometry was the one considered in the earliest investigations [20,21] of boundary critical behaviour at LPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a consequence of the different scaling behaviour of distances along α-and β-directions, it depends on whether the orientation of the surface is parallel or perpendicular which boundary contributions L 1 are potentially infrared relevant below the upper critical dimension d * (m) = 4 + m/2 and hence must be included in the action. The problem of constructing semi-infinite extensions of the models with bulk density (4) for d = d * (m) − ǫ that are "minimal" in the sense that all irrelevant and marginal boundary contributions not compatible with the presumed O(n) and Euclidean ‡ symmetries are discarded was considered for the case of parallel surface orientation in references [15,16], where it was found that a contribution ∝ α (∂ α φ) 2 had to be included in the corresponding surface density L 1 ≡ L 1 , in addition to the one in equation ( 3). The so-obtained semi-infinite model, defined by equation ( 4) in conjunction with the boundary density…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of the existence of this kind of multicritical points in 1975 led to numerous theoretical studies of their bulk critical properties. With the exception of an early attempt by Gumbs [114], surface critical phenomena at a bulk Lifshitz point have only been studied very recently [115,116,117,118,119,120]. Most of the results have been obtained for the semi-infinite ANNNI model.…”
Section: Surface Critical Behaviour Near a Lifshitz Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently Diehl and coworkers [119,120] analysed the surface critical behaviour at bulk Lifshitz points using renormalization group methods. They thereby considered general m-axial Lifshitz points where the wave vector instability takes place in an mdimensional subspace of the d-dimensional space.…”
Section: Surface Critical Behaviour Near a Lifshitz Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2,0) R is ill-defined, and since the renormalization parts of Γ (2,0) appear as di-vergent subgraphs of other vertex functions, his "renormalized" theory quite generally has this deficiency. The fact that the counterterms he employs are insufficient to subtract all primitive q-dependent divergences of Γ (2,0) (q) implies that uv singular pieces of nonlocal form produced by higher-order graphs containing the subgraph 7,8 , such as , will not get canceled by the subtractions provided by the counterterms to two-loop order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%